More Resources
-
February 11, 1999Widening Trench 36 of the 218-E-12B Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, WashingtonOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
February 11, 1999Widening Trench 36 of the 218-E-12B Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, WashingtonOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
February 9, 1999Issued to Argonne National Laboratory related to a Dropped Fuel Basket Assembly and Radiation Protection Program Deficiencies at Argonne National Laboratory-WestOffice of Enterprise Assessments
-
DocumentFebruary 4, 1999The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (Laboratory) stores nearly 65,000 cubic meters of waste generated on site or brought to the State of Idaho (Idaho) from Department of Energy (DOE) sites across the country. Because Idaho was concerned that the State might become a "de facto" permanent repository, the Governor of Idaho sought and received an injunction from the Federal courts which prohibited future waste shipments to Idaho. The injunction also affected the Navy's shipment of spent nuclear fuel into the Laboratory. Due to concerns about the injunction's impact, DOE and the Navy negotiated with Idaho and signed the Idaho Settlement Agreement (Agreement) on October 17, 1995. The purpose of our audit was to determine whether it is in the best interest of the Government to defer processing the 3,100 cubic meters of waste until the new Treatment Facility can do so.Office of Inspector General
-
DocumentFebruary 4, 1999Waste Treatment Plans at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental LaboratoryOffice of Inspector General
-
DocumentFebruary 4, 1999The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Results Act) was enacted to improve Federal program effectiveness and public accountability by promoting a new focus on results-oriented management. The Results Act requires plans that define the mission, long-term goals, and shorter-term performance measures. Further, the Act envisions that there will be an apparent relationship between this information and specific activities listed in the Department’s budget requests. Taken together, these elements should clearly describe the outputs and outcomes the Department expects to deliver for the resources expended. The objectives of this audit were to determine whether the Department had implemented the requirements of the Results Act by (1) integrating the planning, budgeting, and performance measures for its programs into a unified, Departmentwide strategy; (2) developing specific, measurable, and results-oriented performance standards to which its programs and contractors could be held accountable; and (3) developing the means to collect reliable performance data and to use that data in evaluating whether performance actions produce intended results. The information in the Fiscal Year 1999 budget requests for the Offices of Environmental Management, Defense Programs, Energy Research, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and Nuclear Energy Science and Technology formed the basis of our review.odOffice of Inspector General
-
DocumentFebruary 4, 1999The U. S. Department of Energy's Implementation of the Government Performance and Results ActOffice of Inspector General
-
February 2, 1999Office of Hearings and Appeals
-
February 1, 1999Southpoint Power Plant ProjectOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
January 27, 1999Transuranic Waste Treatment Facility at Oak Ridge, TennesseeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance