More Resources

  • March 15, 2000
    Office of Hearings and Appeals
  • March 15, 2000
    The Government Management Reform Act of 1994 requires that the Department of Energy (DOE) annually submit audited financial statements to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). A departmentwide audit was conducted to determine whether there was reasonable assurance that DOE's consolidated Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 financial statements were free of material misstatements. We conducted a portion of the departmentwide audit at the Richland Operations Office (Richland); Office of River Protection (ORP); CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Incorporated (CH2M Hill); Bechtel Hanford, Incorporated (Bechtel); and Fluor Hanford, Incorporated (Fluor) and its subcontractors. The audit disclosed an error, as of September 30, 1999, in the Environmental Liabilities account. Richland's Environmental Liabilities account was understated because the cost estimates for closure of single shell tank farms had not been updated to reflect current engineering estimates. We recommended that Richland adjust the Environmental Liabilities account and that management review other project cost estimates to determine if estimates were based on the best available data. Management concurred with the recommendations and implemented corrective actions.
    Office of Inspector General
  • March 15, 2000
    Report on Matters Identified at The Hanford Site during the Audit of The Department of Energy's Consolidated Fiscal year 1999 Financial Statements
    Office of Inspector General
  • March 14, 2000
    It recently came to our attention thas several contracts awarded by the Department to manage its facilities include clauses requiring charitable giving by the contractors. In pursuit of this matter, the Office of Inspector General conducted a limited review and identified three recent solicitations and corresponding contracts that did, in fact, contain such provisions. These provisions are over and above contractor requirements for local economic development. One contract, for example, requires the contractor to contribute $1 million per year to "educational, cultural, civic, and health and welfare organizations" for each year of the contract. This was consistent with the contractor's commitment made in response to the Department's terms for soliciting bids. the level of giving with respect to the other two contracts we reviewed is $860,000 over the life of one contract and a minimum of $600,000 per year in the other contract. A listing of the solications and contracts is attached.
    Office of Inspector General
  • March 14, 2000
    Charitable Giving Requirements in Department of Energy Contracts
    Office of Inspector General
  • March 13, 2000
    Office of Hearings and Appeals
  • March 9, 2000
    Decontamination and Dismantlement of the Advanced Reactivity Measurement Facility and Coupled Fast Reactivity Measurements Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • March 9, 2000
    Decontamination and Dismantlement of the Advanced Reactivity Measurement Facility and Coupled Fast Reactivity Measurements Facility at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • March 9, 2000
    Office of Hearings and Appeals
  • March 9, 2000
    Electrical Power System Upgrades at Los Alamos National Laboratory
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance