Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory contract

National Nuclear Security Administration

You are here

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
DE-AC52-07NA27344

NNSA's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), located in Livermore, California, is a design laboratory that is responsible for the safety and reliability of the nuclear explosives package in nuclear weapons. It supports surveillance, assessment, and refurbishment of the nuclear weapons stockpile. LLNL also possesses unique high-energy-density physics capabilities and scientific computing assets. The lab is managed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC.

Pre-2013 PER summaries

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary

SUMMARY OF FY 2012 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION

Total Available Fee

Total Fee Earned

%

$50,506,024

$44,555,181

88%

 

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, the management and operating contractor for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, earned a Very Good rating in Programs and Operations, a Good rating in Institutional Management and Business, and 88 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security Administration for its fiscal year 2012 performance.

 

FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary

SUMMARY OF FY 2011 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION

Total Available Fee

Total Fee Earned

%

$29,754,217

$26,255,121

88%

 

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, the management and operating contractor for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, earned a “Very Good” rating and 88 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security Administration for its fiscal year 2011 performance.

Among Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC’s successes:

  • Three Phoenix Mini-Generator experiments have been fired at BEEF.
  • Completed the W87 LEP survivability studies using threat models NWM21-3, NWM21-4, and NWM 21-6.
  • Completed the NIF validation suite of experiments associated with the closure of FY 2010 L1 Milestone (3673).
  • Mission Critical facilities were available 99.96% of scheduled availability.
  • All Environmental Restoration program regulatory milestones were met at both the Livermore Site and Site 300.
  • Expanded implementation of institutional indirect cost baselines and demonstrated utilization of performance reporting and change control process and tools.

Among areas for improvement cited by NNSA:

  • It is recommended that the position of Science Executive be elevated to a higher level of influence regarding management strategy.
  • Deficiencies in Contractor policies and procedures governing site security program requirements.

FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary

SUMMARY OF FY 2010 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION

Total Available Fee

Total Fee Earned

%

$29,754,217

$25,717,050

86.4%

 

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, the management and operating contractor for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, earned a “Very Good” rating and 86.4 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security Administration for its fiscal year 2010 performance.

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary

SUMMARY OF FY 2009 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION

Total Available Fee

Total Fee Earned

%

$31,879,518

$25,286,817

79.3%

 

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, the management and operating contractor for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, earned a “Very Good” rating and 79.3 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security Administration for its fiscal year 2009 performance.

FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary

SUMMARY OF FY 2008 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION

Total Available Fee

Total Fee Earned

%

$31,879,518

$15,795,585

49.5%

 

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, the management and operating contractor for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, earned an “Unsatisfactory” rating and 49.5 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security Administration for its fiscal year 2008 performance.

FY 2007 University of California, PER Summary

SUMMARY OF FY 2007 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AWARD FEE DETERMINATION

Total Available Fee

Total Fee Earned

%

$4,300,000

$3,956,000

92%

 

The University of California, management and operating contractor for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, earned an “Excellent” rating and 92 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security Administration for its fiscal year 2007 performance.

FY 2006 University of California (LLNL), PER Summary

SUMMARY OF FY 2006 UNIVERISTY OF CALIFORNIA AWARD FEE DETERMINATION

Total Available Fee

Total Fee Earned

%

$4,300,000

$3,956,000

92%

 

The University of California, management and operating contractor for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, earned an “Excellent” rating and 92 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security Administration for its fiscal year 2006 performance.

Contract and modifications

Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344

Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

Basic Term (October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2019)

The prime contract, modifications, and archive of past contracts are avaialable at this link.