ALJ Cases

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) authorizes the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to regulate the energy and water efficiency of certain consumer products and industrial equipment.  (42 U.S.C. §§ 6291-6317).  EPCA makes it unlawful for manufacturers, including importers, to distribute in commerce in the U.S. covered consumer products and industrial equipment that does not comply with DOE’s energy or water conservation standards.  (42 U.S.C. § 6302).  EPCA authorizes DOE to enforce compliance with these standards and to assess civil penalties for noncompliance.  (42 U.S.C. § 6303).  EPCA also provides the opportunity for an on-the-record hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to manufacturers who receive a civil penalty notice for alleged noncompliance with the standards.  (42 U.S.C. § 6303).  After the opportunity for a hearing, the ALJ issues an initial decision with the ALJ’s findings and the basis for any civil penalty assessment.  (42 U.S.C. § 6303).  If the ALJ recommends a civil penalty, and the manufacturer does not appeal the ALJ’s initial decision, DOE then issues an Order assessing the civil penalty.  (10 C.F.R. § 429.126). 

 

An ALJ found that Kale Environmental Technology (Shanghai) Corporation manufactured and distributed large-diameter ceiling fans basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.
An ALJ found that SHUWND manufactured and distributed showerheads basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.
An ALJ found that Chigo Electrical Appliances manufactured and distributed dehumidifiers basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards; and that they failed to test the basic models of dehumidifiers in accordance with the applicable test requirements in 10 C.F.R. part 430.
An ALJ found that Shandong Huajing manufactured and distributed doors for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.
An ALJ found that Myra Custom Coolers manufactured and distributed doors for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.
An ALJ found that Global Insulated Doors manufactured and distributed doors for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.
An ALJ found that Advanced Insulation Concepts, Inc. manufactured and distributed doors for walk-in coolers and freezers basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.
An ALJ found that Shenzhenshi Xialan manufactured and distributed faucet basic models in commerce without submitting to DOE a report certifying that the basic models comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.