March 28, 2018

Urgent request for information regarding a potential future use of AMWTP

The ICP CAB requests that DOE release the results of the "business-case" study of a future mission for the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project.

March 10, 2016

Support the budget request for FY 2018 cleanup funding

The INL Site EM CAB recommends that DOE-EM support the budget request for full funding of Idaho cleanup operations in Fiscal Year 2018

April 10, 2013

Increase ICP funding by $30 million a year

The INL Site EM CAB recommends a $30 million annual increase in the Idaho Cleanup Project's budget to continue DOE's momentum toward cleanup.

November 15, 2011

Extend contract for ICP contractor, CWI

The INL Site EM CAB recommends that CH2M-WG Idaho's contract with DOE-EM be extended through 2015 in order to complete current funded work scope

June 22, 2011

Cease consideration of INL as potential disposal location

The INL Site EM CAB is opposed to consideration of the INL as a potential disposal location for GTCC Low-Level Radioactive Waste and GTCC Like Waste

June 25, 2010

Support for multipurpose haul road preferred alternative

The INL Site EM CAB supports the preferred alternative for the multipurpose haul road within the Idaho Site (route south of T-25 power line)

March 24, 2010

Increase FYs 2011 and 2012 funding by $38 million

The INL Site EM CAB recommends that DOE-EM increase ICP funding for FYs 2011 and 2012 from $412 million to $450 million

March 16, 2010

Support for Alternative 3 in Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis for EBR-II D&D

The INL Site EM CAB supports Alternative 3 in the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis for Experiment Breeder Reactor (EBR) II D&D

October 7, 2009

Support for preferred alternative for Operable Unit 10-08

The CAB supports the preferred alternative outlined in the Proposed Plan for Sitewide Groundwater, Miscellaneous Sites, and Process for Future Sites

September 10, 2009

Support for Alternative 3 in EE/CA for D&D of the TRA-632 Hot Cells

The INL Site EM CAB unanimously supports Alternative 3 in the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for decommissioning of TRA-632 hot cells