More Resources

  • CX-004236: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    October 13, 2010
    Utah-Tribe-Skull Valley Band of GoshutesCX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1Date: 10/13/2010Location(s): UtahOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • Finding of No Significant Impact for the Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment
    Document
    October 13, 2010
    DOE prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range (RRTR). The objective of the EA was to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of creating and operating the RRTR.
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • DOE/EA-1776: Finding of No Significant Impact
    Document
    October 13, 2010
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-004233: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    October 13, 2010
    North Carolina-County-IredellCX(s) Applied: A9, B2.5, B5.1Date: 10/13/2010Location(s): Iredell County, North CarolinaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-004232: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    October 13, 2010
    Nebraska-County-SarpyCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 10/13/2010Location(s): Sarpy County, NebraskaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-004231: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    October 13, 2010
    Mississippi-Tribe-Mississippi Band of Choctaw IndiansCX(s) Applied: A9, B2.5, B5.1Date: 10/13/2010Location(s): MississippiOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • SANYO E&E: Order (2010-CE-1210)
    Document
    October 12, 2010
    In the Matter of SANYO E&E Corp. (residential refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers), DOE Case Number 2010-CE-1210, Compromise Agreement. Compromise Agreement (sections redacted). DOE found that SANYO failed to submit compliance certifications for its products under 10 C.F.R. Section 430.74, and here concludes that, because SANYO has certified many of its products (listed on redacted pages), the promise to certify all products precludes the need for a civil penalty in this case.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • CX-011979: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    October 12, 2010
    Chrysler Group Limited Liability Company Retooling, Reequipping, and Engineering Integration at Various United States Facilities ‐ Specific Project #8 CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 10/12/2010 Location(s): Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio Offices...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-011978: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    October 12, 2010
    Chrysler Group Limited Liability Company Retooling, Reequipping, and Engineering Integration at Various United States Facilities ‐ Specific Project #7 CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 10/12/2010 Location(s): Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio Offices...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-011977: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    October 12, 2010
    Chrysler Group Limited Liability Company Retooling, Reequipping, and Engineering Integration at Various United States Facilities ‐ Specific Project #6 CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 10/12/2010 Location(s): Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio Offices...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance