More Resources

  • May 11, 1998
    Office of Hearings and Appeals
  • May 8, 1998
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) at the Savannah River...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • May 6, 1998
    Proposed Conveyance and Transfer of Certain Land Tracts Located at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos and Santa Fe Counties, NM
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • May 1, 1998
    In June 1993, the then Secretary of Energy established a Contract Reform Team to review the Department of Energy’s (DOE) contracting practices and to make recommendations to improve them. The need for contract reform was driven by a recognition that DOE did not have adequate control of its contractors, that contractors were not sufficiently accountable to DOE, and that there was an absence of well-defined performance measures and criteria for DOE contractors.
    Office of Inspector General
  • May 1, 1998
    The Fiscal Year 1996 Performance Based Incentive Program at the Savannah River Operations Office
    Office of Inspector General
  • April 30, 1998
    Project Partnership Transportation of Foreign-Owned Enriched Uranium from the Republic of Georgia
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • April 30, 1998
    The INEEL CAB provides recommendations regarding DOE's Draft Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure document
    Idaho Cleanup Project Citizens Advisory Board
  • April 30, 1998
    During this reporting period, the Office of Inspector General continued to advise Headquarters and field managers of opportunities to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Department's management controls, with particular emphasis on coverage of issues addressed in the Department's Strategic Plan. We also have supported the Department's streamlining initiatives by evaluating the cost effectiveness and overall efficiency of Department programs and operations, placing special emphasis on key issue areas which have historically benefited from Office of Inspector General attention. For example, in this and prior periods, we have concentrated on reviewing performance-based contracts, performance outcomes, cost reduction incentive programs, and performance information systems. We view these efforts as assisting the Department in implementing the Government Performance and Results Act (the Results Act), which requires the Department to establish strategic planning and performance measurement.efor
    Office of Inspector General
  • April 30, 1998
    Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress, 1998
    Office of Inspector General
  • April 27, 1998
    Office of Hearings and Appeals