More Resources
-
October 14, 2005Order authorizing Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc to export electric energy to Mexico.Office of Electricity
-
October 13, 2005Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Rule 213 of the rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. § 385.213, Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ("PJM") hereby answer the Motion of Robert G. Bumley, Director the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality To Deny the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's Petition on the Grounds that the Commission May Not Lawfully Grant the Requested Relief; or, in the Alternative, To Defer Action Pending Further Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Requested Relief ("VDEQ Motion"). j For the reasons detailed in this Answer, Pepco and PJM request that the Commission deny the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality's ("VDEQ") motion.Office of Electricity
-
October 13, 2005Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Rule 213 of the rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. § 385.213, Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ("PJM"...Office of Electricity
-
October 12, 2005Docket No. EO-05-01: Motion of Robert G. Burnley, Director the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to Deny the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's Petition on the Grounds that the Commission May Not Lawfully Grant the Requested Relief; or, in the Alternative, to Defer Action Pending Further Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Requested Relief. Pursuant to Rules 203 and 212 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's ("Commission") Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.203 and 385.212, Robert G. Burnley, Director of the Commonwealth of Virginia's Department of Environmental Quality (the "Director'') hereby files this Motion in response to the Emergency Petition And Complaint ("Petition") filed by the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia ("DC PSC" or "PSC") in the above-referenced proceeding before the Commission.Office of Electricity
-
October 12, 2005Docket No. EO-05-01: Motion of Robert G. Burnley, Director the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to Deny the District of Columbia Public Service Commission's Petition on the Grounds that the Commission May Not Lawfully Grant ...Office of Electricity
-
October 7, 2005Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Section 214 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.214, and the Notice of Filing issued in this proceeding on August 25, 2005, the City of Alexandria, Virginia (“Alexandria”) moves to intervene and provides the following comments in this proceeding.Office of Electricity
-
October 7, 2005Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Section 214 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.214, and the Notice of Filing issued in this proceeding on August 25, 2005, the City of Al...Office of Electricity
-
DocumentOctober 7, 2005Management of the Clean Cities ConferenceOffice of Inspector General
-
DocumentOctober 7, 2005The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has Threat Progress experienced delays in implementing permanent upgrades, including new technologies, to meet the increased threat identified in the 2003 Design Basis Threat (DBT). Instead, NNSA is relying on more costly interim measures to meet the requirements of the DBT by the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2006. The Department has not, however, fully evaluated the effectiveness of either the interim measures or the planned permanent upgrades for all sites that possess special nuclear material.=1;Office of Inspector General
-
DocumentOctober 7, 2005The National Nuclear Security Administration's Implementation of the 2003 Design Basis ThreatOffice of Inspector General