More Resources
-
Response of the Potomac Electric Power Company to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, L.L.C.DocumentJanuary 9, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01: In sum, although Pepco agrees wilh DOE's directive that Mirant "should immediately take the necessary steps to implement Option A of the intermediate phase proposed in the implementation plan,") that Option does not satisfy the concerns identified by DOE in its decision and Order. Pepco agrees that Option B and olher options Ihat are more consistent with the DOE order need to be considered. and Pepco urges the DOE to implement a compliance plan Ihat fully meets the requirements of the DOE Potomac River Order and restores system reliability to the levels existing prior to Mirant's unilateral shutdown in August 2005. Pepco will provide further comments based on its continued review and evaluation of Mirant's proposed operating plan.Office of Electricity
-
Response of the Potomac Electric Power Company to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, L.L.C.DocumentJanuary 9, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01: In sum, although Pepco agrees wilh DOE's directive that Mirant "should immediately take the necessary steps to implement Option A of the intermediate phase proposed in the implementation plan,") that Option does not satisfy the con...Office of Electricity
-
January 9, 2006Outlines the Department’s performance in fiscal year 2006 against the goals set out in the President’s proposed fiscal year 2006 budget.Office of the Chief Financial Officer
-
January 8, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-07-02: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the Department of Energy’s November 2006 Special Environmental Analysis (“SEA”). Notice of Availability of a Special Environmental Analysis; Potomac River Generating System, 71 Fed. Reg. 69102 (Nov. 29, 2006). These comments are submitted, in particular, in response to DOE’s request for suggestions on how to respond when Emergency Order 202-05-3 expires on February 1, 2007.Office of Electricity
-
January 8, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-07-02: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, submits the following comments on the D...Office of Electricity
-
January 6, 2006Y–12 National Security Complex Project, Oak Ridge, TennesseeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
January 6, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-05-03: This letter responds to the allegations of the letter from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and further explains why outages of the two 230 kV transmission lines must occur as soon as possible to ensure electric reliability to the national capital region and to prevent the deleterious health and safety impacts that would occur in the event of an interruption in electric power service to that area.Office of Electricity
-
January 6, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01: Following the release of the Department of Energy's Order No. 202-05-3 issued December 20, 2005 (the "Order"), both the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality ("DEQ") and the City of Alexandria (the "City") have filed letters asserting an imminent breach of the Order. PJM responds to those letters and takes issue both (i) with the assertion of an imminent breach of the Order, and (ii) the suggestion that maintenance of transmission facilities serving the District of Columbia be deferred until some later date.Office of Electricity
-
January 6, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01: This report describes dispersion modeling performed for simultaneous operation of one baseload unit and two cycling units at Mirant’s Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS). This mode of operation is also referred to as Option A in Mirant Potomac River LLC’s December 30, 2005 letter to the U.S. Department of Energy regarding District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05- 01. The modeling was performed according to the Protocol approved by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. The purpose of the modeling was to demonstrate that Option A operations will not cause or contribute to exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).Office of Electricity
-
January 6, 2006Docket No. EO-05-01. Comments from the City of Alexandria in support of the comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve the Potomac River Substation on January 9, 2006.Office of Electricity