More Resources

  • CX-001684: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    April 8, 2010
    Oklahoma State Energy Program (SEP) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) - ManagementCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 04/08/2010Location(s): OklahomaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-001628: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    April 8, 2010
    Solar American Initiative Incubator- TetraSun Inc.; Back Surface Passivation for High Efficiency Crystalline Silicon Solar CellsCX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 04/08/2010Location(s): Milpitas, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golde...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-001600: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    April 8, 2010
    Aerial Photography of Solar Parabolic Trough Field at Abengoa Research Facilities, Lakewood, ColoradoCX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.6Date: 04/08/2010Location(s): Lakewood, ColoradoOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-001598: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    April 8, 2010
    Aerial Photography of Solar Parabolic Trough Field at Cameo, ColoradoCX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.6Date: 04/08/2010Location(s): Cameo, ColoradoOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-001427: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    April 8, 2010
    Coal Ash Behavior in Reducing Environments (CABRE) III Phase IIICX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 04/08/2010Location(s): Grand Forks, North DakotaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • Finding of No Significant Impact for Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Project Pyrotek, Incorporated Sanborn, New York
    Document
    April 7, 2010
    Based on the analyses in the Environmental Assessment, DOE determined that its proposed action - awarding a federal grant to Pyrotek, Inc. for its expansion of an existing manufacturing plant - would result in no significant adverse impacts.
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • DOE/EA-1720: Finding of No Significant Impact
    Document
    April 7, 2010
    Based on DOE/EA-1720, FONSI for the expansion of an existing manufacturing facility to produce high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batter
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • In the Matter of Arcelik AS; Case Number 2010-SE-0105; Subpoena for information and production of documents
    Document
    April 7, 2010
    In the Matter of Arcelik AS; Case Number 2010-SE-0105; Subpoena for information and production of documents DOE received information the Arcelik's Blomberg brand refrigerator-freezer did not comply with energy conservation standards set forth in the EPCA and DOE's regulations. DOE is subpoenaing Arcelik for information because DOE is conducting an inquiry into this model's compliance.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • CX-001632: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    April 7, 2010
    CRED - Phillips County 30 Megawatt Wind ProjectCX(s) Applied: A9Date: 04/07/2010Location(s): Phillips County, ColoradoOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-001488: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    April 7, 2010
    Public Commuter Bike Station (and Cycling Initiative)CX(s) Applied: A11, B5.1Date: 04/07/2010Location(s): Saint Louis, MissouriOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance