More Resources
-
April 19, 2010California-City-PalmdaleCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1Date: 04/19/2010Location(s): Palmdale, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
April 19, 2010Uninterruptable Power Supply/Generator ReplacementCX(s) Applied: B1.23, B1.3Date: 04/19/2010Location(s): Amarillo, TexasOffice(s): NNSA-Headquarters, Pantex Site OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
DocumentApril 19, 2010This is a request by UT-BATTELLE, LLC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC05-00OR22725Office of the General Counsel
-
April 19, 2010Park County's Activity Area 1 (Development of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy)CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B5.1Date: 04/19/2010Location(s): Livingston-Park County, MontanaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
April 19, 2010Application of 2-Dimensional Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP) Imaging to the Targeting of Exploration and Development Wells in a Basin and Range Geothermal System - Humboldt House-Rye Patch Geothermal Area - Pershing County, NevadaCX(s) Applied: B3.1, B5...Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
April 19, 2010This is a request by URS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-04NT42314Office of the General Counsel
-
April 19, 2010In the matter of: Westinghouse Lighting Corporation (flourescent and incandescent reflector lamps), DOE Case Number: 2010-CE-09/1001, Notice of Proposed Civic Penalty. In this notice, DOE alleges that Westinghouse Lighting Corporation has 72 violations of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) by failing to certify that its covered products meet the aplicable energy conservation standards. The DOE proposes a civil penalty of $350,400, with a maximum possible assessment of $3,433,050. The notice describes that some response is required within 30 days, outlining 3 options, including the acceptance of an assessment of the proposed civil penalty, the right to have the matter referred to an Administrative Law Judge, and finally the option to seek a compromise agreement with the DOE. The notice goes on to instruct on what should be included in a response, and what the maximum penalties could be. It also includes a list of the products in violation.Office of the General Counsel
-
April 19, 2010Hanford Patrol 200 East Area BuildingCX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 04/19/2010Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
April 19, 2010Solar for SchoolsCX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1Date: 04/19/2010Location(s): Austin, TexasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
April 16, 2010PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment BoxOffice of Management