More Resources
-
July 22, 2010Habematolel Pomo of Upper LakeCX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1Date: 07/22/2010Location(s): Upper Lake, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
July 22, 2010Manchester Band of Pomo Indians of the Manchester-Point Arena Rancheria, CaliforniaCX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1Date: 07/22/2010Location(s): CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
July 22, 2010Mentasta Traditional CouncilCX(s) Applied: A9, A11Date: 07/22/2010Location(s): AlaskaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
July 22, 2010Hoonah Indian AssociationCX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1Date: 07/22/2010Location(s): AlaskaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
July 22, 2010Mecklenburg County Landfill Energy ProjectCX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 07/22/2010Location(s): Mecklenburg County, VirginiaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
July 22, 2010South Boston Landfill Energy ProjectCX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 07/22/2010Location(s): South Boston, VirginiaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
July 22, 2010Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant DE-EE0000667 State of Nebraska National Environmental Policy Act Template (T)CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1Date: 07/22/2010Location(s): NebraskaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field...Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
Press ReleaseJuly 22, 2010U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced today the selections of six projects that aim to find ways of converting captured carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources into useful products such as fuel, plastics, cement, and fertilizers.Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy Office
-
July 22, 2010Office of Electricity
-
DocumentJuly 22, 2010The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), in partnership with the Department of Defense, maintains the Nation's arsenal of nuclear weapons through a geographically dispersed Nuclear Weapons Complex (Complex). In support of this mission, NNSA relies upon numerous and disparate site-specific and cross-Complex information systems to help manage the nuclear weapon product life-cycle process. NNSA, in its own planning documents, has noted that since Fiscal Year (FY) 2000, it had devoted considerable resources to these systems, acknowledging that their operation and management costs were not always well defined nor completely understood. To respond effectively to changing requirements, and, share and exchange weapon product information among sites, NNSA established its Product Realization Integrated Digital Enterprise (PRIDE) Program in FY 2007. PRIDE was established to develop and deploy a modernized, integrated suite of enhanced information technology (IT) capabilities to securely deliver weapon product life-cycle information to users across sites. NNSA anticipated that PRIDE would result in a reduction in weapon development cycle times and associated expenses. By the second year of the program, PRIDE consisted of over 100 sub-projects. NNSA originally planned to complete development activities within the PRIDE program by the end of FY 2014 at a projected total cost of approximately $83 million. Given the importance and significant cost of the PRIDE initiative, we conducted this audit to determine whether development had been managed in a manner that would permit the system to achieve its intended goals and objectives.Office of Inspector General