More Resources

  • CX-003604: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    Christmas Valley Congressionally Directed Project Fiscal Year 2010 Continuation Renewable Energy Education and OutreachCX(s) Applied: A9Date: 08/30/2010Location(s): Christmas Valley, OregonOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-003599: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Program - Desert HillsCX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 08/30/2010Location(s): Yerington, NevadaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-003523: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    Small Wind Turbine Regional Test Center Kansas State University; National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tracking Number 10-029CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.15, B3.1, B5.1Date: 08/30/2010Location(s): Colby, KansasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable En...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-003522: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    DE-EE0000132 Take Charge ChallengeCX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1Date: 08/30/2010Location(s): KansasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-003509: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Energy Innovations Expansion of Solar Module Production LinesCX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 08/30/2010Location(s): Poway, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field O...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-003506: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Quantum Solar Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing PlantCX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 08/30/2010Location(s): Irvine, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • CX-003505: Categorical Exclusion Determination
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Calisolar's Solar Manufacturing Capacity ExpansionCX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1Date: 08/30/2010Location(s): Sunnyvale, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field O...
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105)
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    In the Matter of: Arçelik A.Ş / Arcelik A.S (refrigerator-freezer), DOE Case Number: 2010-SE-0105, Notice of Compliance Determination. In this notice, DOE summarizes the process by which Arçelik A.Ş' / Arcelik A.S' Blomberg refrigerator-freezer was determined to be compliant with applicable energy conservation standards. After the company submitted test data, the DOE subjected the product to additional testing and found that it satisfied the Energy Star program requirements. The notice officially closes the case.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • Arçelik A.Ş: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105)
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination after test results revealed that a certain Arçelik's Blomberg refrigerator-freezer is compliant.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • Declaration of Charles Wodrich in Support of Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of “Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016
    Document
    August 30, 2010
    Declaration of Charles Wodrich in Support of Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Institute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of “Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016. Charles Woodrich was tasked with evaluating the costs associated with changing the definition of "showerhead." Based on Woodrich's data, the total cost of changing the definition would result in $108,700,000. The revenues generated annually by products that could be affected by the proposed definition of “showerhead” would total $303,300,000. If tub/shower combos and diverter valves are excluded from the combined revenues above, the total would be reduced by approximately $80,000,000, to $223,300,000. The combined one-time costs and recurring costs reported to W&W were $412,000,000.
    Office of the General Counsel