More Resources

  • October 8, 2010
    DOE ordered Nordyne, LLC d/b/a Garrison Heating and Cooling Products to pay a $10,000 civil penalty after finding Nordyne had failed to certify that certain models of central air conditioners and central air conditioning heat pumps comply with the appl...
    Office of the General Counsel
  • October 8, 2010
    DOE ordered Jandy Pool Products, Inc. to pay a $10,000 civil penalty after finding Jandy Pool Products had failed to certify that certain models of pool heaters comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • October 8, 2010
    In the Matter of Penguin Toilets, LLC (water closets), DOE Case Number 2010-W-1615, Compromise Agreement. Compromise Agreement. DOE found that Penguin failed to submit compliance certifications for its products under 10 C.F.R. Section 430.62, and here assesses a civil penalty of $5,000 (if paid within 30 days) or of $10,000 (if paid between 31-60 days). Penguin promises to certify all products sold in the US within 60 days, and agrees to a penalty of $150 per product per day over that deadline. In exchange, DOE will accept the penalty payment, issue the adopting order, and cease enforcement action.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • October 8, 2010
    DOE ordered Penguin Toilets, LLC to pay a $5,000 civil penalty after finding Penguin Toilets had failed to certify that certain models of water closets comply with the applicable water conservation standards.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • October 8, 2010
    Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460)
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • October 8, 2010
    Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 0456)
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
  • October 8, 2010
    In the Matter of Fuzhou Sunlight Lighting Electrical Appliance Company, Ltd. (lamps), DOE Case Number 2010-SE-1402, Notice of Allowance to Resume Distribution. DOE found certain Fuzhou (Westinghouse) products in violation of applicable energy conservation standards and ordered that Fuzhou stop distribution. Fuzhou's testing was not in accordance with DOE procedures. Upon re-testing (based on DOE test requirements), one model met the appropriate standard, and this letter permits Fuzhou to resume distribution of that model.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • October 8, 2010
    In the Matter of Aero-Tech Light Bulb Co., DOE Case Number: 2010-CE-1012, Order DOE initiated a case against Aero-Tech on Sept. 8, 2010 to pursue a civil penalty for violation of the compliance certification requirements at 10 C.F.R. section 430.62. DOE found that Aero-Tech manufactured and/or privately labeled incandescent light reflector lamps and did not violated the regulations.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • October 8, 2010
    DOE issued an Order and closed this case against Aero-Tech Light Bulb Co., without civil penalty, after DOE found that Aero-Tech manufactured and/or privately labeled incandescent reflector lamps, but did not violate DOE regulations.
    Office of the General Counsel
  • October 8, 2010
    Project T-221, Hazardous Material Management and Emergency Response (HAMMER) Operations BuildingCX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 10/08/2010Location(s): Richmond, WashingtonOffice(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office
    Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance