More Resources
-
March 4, 2011D&R Two Utility Poles and Overhead Line and Install One Utility Pole and Overhead LineCX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 03/04/2011Location(s): Aiken, South CarolinaOffice(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
March 4, 2011Idaho Completion Project Environmental and Regulatory Service ActivitiesCX(s) Applied: B3.1Date: 03/04/2011Location(s): IdahoOffice(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
March 4, 2011Solar Junction's 100 Megawatt Manufacturing LineCX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 03/04/2011Location(s): San Jose, CaliforniaOffice(s): Loan Guarantee Program OfficeOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
March 4, 2011Nashua Community College Solar Hot WaterCX(s) Applied: B5.1Date: 03/04/2011Location(s): Nashua, New HampshireOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology LaboratoryOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance
-
March 4, 2011DOE Showerhead Enforcement Guidance, March 4, 2011. A showerhead with multiple nozzles constitutes a single showerhead for purposes of EPCA’s water conservation standard. Thus, the Department has authority to take enforcement action against the manufacturers of multiple nozzle showerheads which exceed the 2.5 gpm maximum. The Department understands that some manufacturers may have made design and production decisions based on their apparent misunderstanding of how to measure compliance with Congress’s 2.5 gpm standard. The Department will provide an enforcement grace period of two years from today to allow such manufacturers to sell any remaining non-compliant multi-nozzle products, and to give manufacturers the opportunity to adjust their product designs in order to ensure compliance with EPCA and the Department’s regulations.Office of the General Counsel
-
March 4, 2011DOE Showerhead Enforcement Guidance, issued March 4, 2011, provide an enforcement grace period of two years (until March 4, 2013) to allow such manufacturers to sell any remaining non-compliant multi-nozzle products and to give manufacturers the opport...Office of the General Counsel
-
March 4, 2011DOE referred Haier room air conditioner model ESA408J to EPA, brand manager of the ENERGY STAR program, for appropriate action after DOE testing revealed that the model does not meet ENERGY STAR requirements.Office of the General Counsel
-
March 4, 2011On Feb. 7, 2011, DOE notified Freidrich that room air conditioner model CP15F10 did not meet ENERGY STAR energy-efficient requirements. DOE gave Friedrich until Feb. 28, 201 to meet energy-efficient standards. DOE determined that Friedrich did not meet the ENERGY STAR requirements and decided to refer the matter to the EPA.Office of the General Counsel
-
March 4, 2011DOE referred the matter of Friedrich room air conditioner model CP15F10 to the EPA for appropriate action after DOE testing showed that the model does not meet the ENERGY STAR specification.Office of the General Counsel
-
March 4, 2011Y–12 National Security Complex Project, Oak Ridge, TNOffice of NEPA Policy and Compliance