On January 17, 2019, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she determine that an Individual's DOE access authorization should not be restored. In invoking Guidelines G, I, and J, the Local Security Office (LSO) relied upon the Individual's history of driving after alcohol consumption and a psychologist's diagnosis of the Individual with Unspecified Alcohol Disorder. At the hearing, the Individual presented evidence that she had attended court-mandated weekly alcohol classes and was attending individual counseling once per month. However, she admitted to consuming alcohol as recently as recently as the weekend before her hearing, despite the psychologist's recommendation that she abstain from alcohol for several months. After carefully considering the totality of the record, the Administrative Judge found that the Individual had not resolved the concerns raised under Guideline G because she had not abstained from alcohol and had no intent to do so for the recommended period. The Administrative Judge found that the concerns under Guidelines I and J were so inextricably linked to the Individual's Guideline G concerns that they could not be resolved without resolution of the Guideline G concerns. Consequently, based on all of the above, the Administrative Judge found that the Individual's access authorization should not be restored. OHA Case No. PSH-18-0075 (Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman).