On January 3, 2019, an Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she determined that an Individual’s DOE access authorization should not be restored. To support invoking Guideline G, the Local Security Office cited, among other things, the DOE Psychologist’s conclusion that the Individual meets the criteria for a diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder, Severe not in Remission, without adequate evidence of rehabilitation or reformation under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and the Individual’s continued consumption of alcohol, despite a recommendation after treatment that he abstain from alcohol and his own concerns about his drinking habits. After the hearing, the Administrative Judge found that the Individual had not mitigated the security concerns based on the Individual’s recent relapses, including one the week before the hearing, the Individual’s failure to follow any of the DOE Psychologist’s treatment recommendations, and the DOE Psychologist’s affirmation of his previous diagnosis that the Individual had an alcohol use disorder. Based on the foregoing, the Administrative Judge found that the Individual had not mitigated the Guideline G security concerns, and accordingly, determined that the Individual’s access authorization should not be restored. OHA Case No. PSH-18-0072 (Brooke A. DuBois).