Citation

Link

Census (U.S. Census Bureau), 2017a, Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles – Block Groups New Mexico (accessed January 2017, https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/cbf/cbf_blkgrp.html).

1

Census (U.S. Census Bureau), 2017b, American FactFinder, B03002 Hispanic or Latin Origin by Race (file ACS_15_5YR_B03002_with_ann.csv (accessed January 2017, https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml).

2

Census (U.S. Census Bureau), 2017c, American FactFinder, C17002 Ratio of Income to Poverty Level in the past 12 Months (file ACS_15_5YR_B03002_with_ann.csv (accessed January 2017, https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml). 

3

Census (U.S. Census Bureau), 2017d, American FactFinder, B03002 Hispanic or Latin Origin by Race, County level data (accessed February 2017, https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview....).

4

DNFSB (Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board), 2017, Letter from J. L. Connery, Chariman DNFSB, to The Honorable Ernest J. Moniz, Secretary of Energy, January 3. 

5

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 1992, DOE Standard – Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports, DOE-STD‑1027-92, Change Notice No. 1, September 1997, Washington, DC, December.

6

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 1993, DOE Standard – Natural Phenomena Hazards Performance Categorization Guidelines for Structures, Systems, and Components, DOE-STD-1021-93, Reaffirmed with Errata, April 2002, Washington, DC, July.

7

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 1999, Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Conveyance and Transfer of Certain Land Tracts Administered by the U.S. Department of Energy and Located at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos and Santa Fe Counties, New Mexico, DOE/EIS-0293, Los Alamos Area Office, Los Alamos, New Mexico, October.

8

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2002, DOE Standard – Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities, DOE-STD-1020-2002, Washington, DC, January.

9

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2003a, Estimating Radiation Risk from Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE), ISCORS Technical Report No. 1, DOE/EH-412/0015/0802, Rev. 1, Office of Environmental Policy and Guidance, January. 

10

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2003b, Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, DOE/EIS-0350, National Nuclear Security Administration, Los Alamos Site Office, Los Alamos, New Mexico, November. 

11

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2004a, MACCS2 Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis, DOE-EH-4.2.1.4-MACCS2-Code Guidance, Washington, DC, June.

12

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2004b, Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements, Second Edison, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, December.

13

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2005, Supplement Analysis, Environmental Impact Statement for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement (CMRR) Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Changes to the Location of the CMRR Facility Components, DOE/EIS-0350-SA-01, Los Alamos Site Office, Los Alamos, New Mexico, January. 

14

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2008a, Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, DOE/EIS-0380, National Nuclear Security Administration, Los Alamos Site Office, Los Alamos, New Mexico, May.

15

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2008b, Final Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, DOE/EIS-0236-S4, National Nuclear Security Administration, Washington, DC, October.

16

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2008c, DOE Standard – Radiological Control, DOE-STD-1098-2008, Washington, DC, October.

17

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2011a, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, DOE O 458.1, Admin Change 3 (1-15-13), Office of Health, Safety and Security, Washington, DC, February 11.

18

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2011b, Nuclear Material Control and Accountability, DOE O 474.2, Change 4 (9-13-16), Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, Washington, DC, June 27.

19

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2011c, Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, DOE/EIS-0350-S1, Los Alamos, New Mexico, August.

20

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2012a, Memorandum, D. L. Cook, National Nuclear Security Administration, Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs, to K. Smith, Manager, Los Alamos Site Office, and C. McMillan, Director, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Guidance on the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR‑NF) Project, February 13.

21

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2012b, DOE Standard – Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities, DOE-STD-1020-2012, Washington, DC, December.

22

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2013a, Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada, DOE/EIS-0426, Nevada Site Office, Las Vegas, Nevada, February.

23

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2013b, DOE Handbook, Airborne Release Fractions/Rates and Respirable Fractions for Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities, Volume I and II, DOE-HDBK‑3010-94, Reaffirmed 2015, Washington, DC.

24

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2014, DOE Standard – Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis, DOE‑STD‑3009‑2014, Washington, DC, November.

25

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2015a, Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Supplement Analysis, DOE/EIS‑0350-SA-2, Los Alamos, New Mexico, January.

26

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2015b, Department of Energy FY 2016 Congressional Budget Request, National Nuclear Security Administration, DOE/CF-0107, Volume 1, Washington, DC, February.

27

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2015c, Final Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, DOE/EIS-0283-S2, Office of Fissile Materials Disposition and Office of Environmental Management, Washington, DC, April. 

28

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2015d, DOE 2014 Occupational Radiation Exposure, Office of Environment, Health, Safety, and Security, September.

29

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2016a, Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Revision 8.0, DOE/WIPP-02-3122, Carlsbad Field Office, Carlsbad, New Mexico, July 5. 

30

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2016b, Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report – 2016, DOE/TRU-16-3425, Revision 0, Carlsbad Field Office, Carlsbad, New Mexico, December. 

31

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2016c, DOE 2015 Occupational Radiation Exposure, Office of Environment, Health, Safety, and Security, October.

32

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2016d, Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste and GTCC-Like Waste, DOE/EIS-0375, Office of Environmental Management, Washington, DC, January.

33

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2017a, Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory, DOE/EIS-0402, Office of Environmental Management, Simi Valley, California, January.

34

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2017b, DOE 2016 Occupational Radiation Exposure, Office of Environment, Health, Safety, and Security, November. 

35

EnergySolutions, 2016, Letter from V. C. Rogers to S. T. Anderson, Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control, Ground Water Quality Discharge Permit Condition I.H.6 – 2016 Annual As-Built Reports, November 29.

36

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1988, Federal Guidance Report No. 11, Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion, and Ingestion, EPA 520/1-88-020 (available at: http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/ docs/federal/520-1-88-020.pdf), Washington, DC, September.

37

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1999a, Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides, Federal Guidance Report No. 13, EPA 402-R-99-001, September. 

38

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1999b, Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA Documents, EPA 315-R-99-002, Office of Federal Activities, Washington, DC, May.

39

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2016, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2014, EPA 430-R-16-002, Washington, DC, April 15. 

40

ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection), 1991, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60, Elmsford, New York.

41

ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection), 2012, Compendium of Dose Coefficients Based on ICRP Publication 60, ICRP Publication 119, Pergamon Press. 

42

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2004, Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species, LA-CP-0-0921, Los Alamos, New Mexico.  OUO

43

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2006, Amended Biological Assessment:  The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species, LA-CP-06-0020, Los Alamos, New Mexico.  OUO

44

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2007, Amended Biological Assessment:  The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species, LA-CP-07-0823, Los Alamos, New Mexico.  OUO

45

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2009, Amended Biological Assessment:  The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species, LA-CP-09-00626, Los Alamos, New Mexico.  OUO

46

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2011, Biological Assessment of the Effects of Proposed Temporary Spoils Storage, Staging, New Parking, and Vehicle Turnaround on Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species:  The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species, LA‑CP-11-00306, Los Alamos, New Mexico.  OUO

47

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2012, SWEIS Yearbook 2010, Comparison of 2010 Data to Projections of the Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-12-01648, Los Alamos, New Mexico, April.

48

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2013a, SWEIS Yearbook 2011, Comparison of 2011 Data to Projections of the 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-13-020455, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

49

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2013b, SWEIS Yearbook 2012, Comparison of 2012 Data to Projections of the 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-13-029469, Los Alamos, New Mexico, December.

50

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2014, Fiscal Year 2015 Site Sustainability Plan, LA‑UR‑15‑21896, Los Alamos, New Mexico, December 11.

51

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2015, SWEIS Yearbook 2013, Comparison of 2013 Data to Projections of the 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-15-22755, Los Alamos, New Mexico, July. 

52

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2016a, Facts, Figures for 2016 (accessed October 12, 2016, http://www.lanl.gov/about/facts-figures/index.php). 

53

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2016b, SWEIS Yearbook 2014, Comparison of 2014 Data to Projections of the 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-16-24711, Los Alamos, New Mexico, July. 

54

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2016c, Los Alamos National Laboratory 2015 Annual Site Environmental Report, LA-UR-16-26788, Los Alamos, New Mexico, September. 

55

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2017, Los Alamos National Laboratory 2016 Annual Site Environmental Report, LA-UR-17-27987, Los Alamos, New Mexico, September. 

56

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory), 2018, Response to Data Call for NEPA Environmental Assessment: Proposed Physical and Operational Changes for Analytical Chemistry and Materials Characterization at the Radiological Laboratory Utility Office Building, Rev. 2, LA-UR-17-24977, Los Alamos, New Mexico, February 5. 

57

NA-LA (National Nuclear Security Administration’s Los Alamos Field Office), 2017, NA-LA NEPA Compliance Officer (NCO) Compliance Determination Form LAN No: 18-01, Proposal to conduct mobile-loading operations of transuranic and mixed transuranic waste at Technical Area 55, Los Alamos, New Mexico, October 26.

58

NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements), 1993, Risk Estimates for Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 115, Bethesda, Maryland, December 31.

59

Neuhauser, K. S. and F. L. Kanipe, 2003, RADTRAN 5 User Guide, revised by R. F. Weiner, SAND2003-2354, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July. 

60

NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration), 2012, Los Alamos National Laboratory Factsheet.  

61

NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration), 2014, Guidance on Using Release Fraction and Modern Dosimetric Information Consistently with DOE STD 1027-92, Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports, Change Notice No. 1, Admin Change 1: 5-13-14, Office of Safety and Health, Washington, DC, November 28.

62

NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration), 2016a, RLUOB Radiological Laboratory Utility Office Building, Factsheet.

63

NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration), 2016b, TA‑55 PF‑4 LANL Plutonium-Processing Facilities, Factsheet (accessed October 26, 2016, http://lanl.gov/newsroom/factsheets/index.php).

64

NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission), 1990, MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS), NUREG/CR-4691, Vol. 3, Washington, DC, February.

65

NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission), 1998, Code Manual for MACCS2:  Volume 1, User’s Guide, NUREG/CR-6613, SAND97-0594, Washington, DC, May. 

66

NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission), 2007, WinMACCS, a MACCS2 Interface for Calculating Health and Economic Consequences from Accidental Release of Radioactive Materials into the Atmosphere, User’s Guide and Reference Manual, WinMACCS Version 3, August.

67

SNL (Sandia National Laboratories), 2016, 2015 Annual Site Environmental Report for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico, SAND2016-7275R, Albuquerque, New Mexico, September.

68

UMTRI (University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute), 2003, Evaluation of the Motor Carrier Management Information System Crash File, Phase 1, UMTRI-2003-6, Ann Arbor, Michigan, March.

69

USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), 2005, Letter from S. MacMullin, USFWS Field Supervisor, to E. Withers, NNSA ESA Program Manager, Re: Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Consultation #2-22-03-1-0302 dated March 9, 2005, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

70

USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), 2006, Letter from B. Hanson, USFWS Acting Field Supervisor, to E. Withers, NNSA ESA Program Manager, Re: Amended Biological Assessment:  The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Consultation #2-22-03-1-0302 dated February 7, 2006, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

71

USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), 2007, Letter from W. Murphy, USFWS Field Supervisor, to V. Loucks, NNSA Biological Resource Program Manager, Re: Amended Biological Assessment: The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Consultation #22420-2007-1-0126 dated September 26, 2007, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

72

USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), 2009, Letter from W. Murphy, USFWS Field Supervisor, to V. Loucks, NNSA Biological Resource Program Manager, Re: Amended Biological Assessment:  The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Consultation #22420-09-1-0066 dated August 6, 2009, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

73

USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), 2011, Letter from W. Murphy, USFWS Field Supervisor, to V. Loucks, NNSA Biological Resource Program Manager, Re: Biological Assessment of the Effects of Proposed Temporary Spoils Storage, Staging, New Parking, and Vehicle Turnaround on Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species:  The Potential Effects of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility Replacement Project on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Consultation #22420-2011-1-0052 dated May 2, 2011, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

74

WCS (Waste Control Specialists), 2017, Federal Waste Facility (accessed February 9, 2017, http://www.wcstexas.com/facilities/federal-waste/).

75

Weiner, R. F., D. Hinojosa, T. J. Heames, C. O. Farnum, and E. A. Kalinina, 2013, RADTRAN6/RadCat 6 User Guide, SAND2013-8095, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuerque, New Mexico, September. 

76

WH (The White House, Office of the Press Secretary), 2014, Fact Sheet:  What Climate Change Means for New Mexico and the Southwest, Washington, DC, May 6. 

77

Yost, N. R., M. W. Salmon, E. R. MacFarlane, and L. K. Goen, 2016, Results of RLUOB Seismic Study – With Updated Conclusions, LA-UR-16-28686, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, November.

78

Yuan, Y. C., S. Y. Chen, B. M. Biwer, and D. J. LePoire, 1995, RISKIND – A Computer Program for Calculating Radiological Consequences and Health Risks from Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel, ANL/EAD-1, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, November. 

79