This section provides a list of past evaluation reports for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Many of the listed reports are available as downloads. The table below tells you which offices have reports accessible as downloads. A checked box in the table indicates materials are available for a particular office. Click the name of the office to go to its reports listing, where documents can be found.

Technology Development Offices

Business Operations, Communications, and EERE Corporate

Technology Development Offices

Advanced Manufacturing Office (formerly Industrial Technologies Program)

Peer Reviews

• Reducing Embodied-Energy and Decreasing Emissions in Materials Manufacturing Institute Peer Review, August 28-29, 2018
• Institute for Advanced Composite Manufacturing Innovation Peer Review, August 15-16, 2018
• 2018 Advanced Manufacturing Office Program Peer Review, July 17-19, 2018
• Rapid Advancement in Process Intensification Deployment Institute Peer Review, July 11-12, 2018
• Power America Institute Peer Review, June 12-13, 2018
• Critical Materials Institute Peer Review, May 15-16, 2018
• Manufacturing Demonstration Facility Peer Review, April 5-6, 2018
• Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) Peer Review, June 13-14, 2017
• Critical Materials Institute Peer Review, July 18-19, 2017
• Power America Peer Review, May 9-10, 2017
• Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI) Peer Review, Aug 15-16, 2017
• Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) Peer Review, April 12-13, 2017
• 2016 AMO Peer Review Final Report, June 14-15, 2016  
• AMO Peer Review, May 28-29, 2015
• Energy Intensive Processes (EIP) Workshop, September 1-2, 2009
• Chemicals Portfolio Review, AICHE Spring Meeting, April 2007
• Sensor & Automation Portfolio Review on June 13, 2007
• Sensors & Automation Portfolio Review at Sensors Expo, Rosemont, IL, June 2006
• Forest Products peer, April 4-6, 2006
• ITP Corporate Peer Review, Sept 6-8, 2006
• Chemicals Portfolio Review, AICHE Spring Meeting, April 2006
• Sensor & Automation Portfolio Review, June 13, 2007
• Sensors & Automation Portfolio Review at Sensors Expo, Rosemont, IL June 5-6, 2006
• Forest Products Peer Review, April 5-6, 2006
• Mining Portfolio Review at Society of Mining Engineers, March 2, 2005
• Metal Casting Portfolio Review, April 1, 2005
• Chemicals Portfolio Review at AIChE Spring Meeting, April 11, 2005
• Summary Report on the FY2005 Materials Portfolio Review, June 2005
• Sensors and Automation Portfolio Review, June 6, 2005
• Steel Portfolio Review, September 2005
• Glass Portfolio Review, September 2005
• Aluminum Portfolio Review, October 1, 2005
• Forest Products Portfolio Review, October 5, 2005
• Industrial Energy Systems Portfolio Review, December 1, 2005
• Decreasing Energy Intensity in Manufacturing: Assessing the Strategies and Future Directions of the Industrial Technologies Program, 2005
• Metal Casting Portfolio Review, October 2004
• Chemicals Portfolio Review at AIChE Spring Meeting, March 2004
• Materials Portfolio Review, June 2004
• Sensors and Automation Portfolio Review at Sensors Expo at McCormack Place, June 2004
• Steel Portfolio Review, September 2004
• Glass Portfolio Review, June 2004
• Aluminum Portfolio Review, October 2004
• Summary of FY2004 Forest Products Portfolio Review, May 2004
• Combustion and Supporting Industries Portfolio Review, September 2004
• Industrial Energy Systems Portfolio Review, 2004
• Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies, NRC, 1999
• Intermetallic Alloy Development: A Program Evaluation, National Materials Advisory Board, NRC, publication NMAB-487-1, 1997

Stage Gate Reviews

• None

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Saving Energy, Building Skills: Industrial Assessment Center Impact, by SRI International, March 2015
• Impacts: Industrial Technologies Program. Summary of Program Results for CY 2010, PNNL, March 2013
• Impacts: Industrial Technologies Program. Summary of Program Results for CY 2009, PNNL, October 2011
• Impacts: Industrial Technologies Program. Summary of Program Results for CY 2008, PNNL, August 2010
• Results from the U.S. DOE 2010 Save Energy Now Assessment Initiative, July 2010
• Impacts: Industrial Technologies Program. Summary of Program Results for CY 2007, PNNL, December 2009
• Results from the U.S. DOE 2007 Save Energy Now Assessment Initiative, full report, April 2009
• Results from the U.S. DOE 2007 Save Energy Now Assessment Initiative, summary report, April 2009
• Impacts: Industrial Technologies Program. Summary of Program Results for CY 2006, PNNL, September 2008
• Customer Response to BESTPRACTICES Training and Software Tools Provided by DOE's Industrial Technologies Program, Martin Schweitzer, Michaela A. Martin, Richard L. Schmoyer, Report Number ORNL/CON-502, March 2008
• Results from the U.S. DOE 2009 Save Energy Now Assessment Initiative, September 2007, full report
• Impacts: Industrial Technologies Program, Summary of Program Results for CY 2005, PNNL, February 2007
• Impacts: Industrial Technologies Program: Summary of Program Results for CY 2004, PNNL, February 2006
• 2005 Best Practices Program Evaluation, 2006
• 2004 Best Practices Program Evaluation, 2005
• Technology Commercialization Impact Study, 2005
• Energy Management Pathfinding: Ten Manufacturing Case Studies of Corporate Energy Management, 2005
• Technology Commercialization Impact Study, 2004
• Evaluation of the Compressed Air Challenge^® Training Program, Xnergy Inc., 2004
• Corporate Energy Management Practices in Industry for the U.S. DOE's Industrial Technologies Program, 2004
• Estimation of Energy Savings Resulting from the Best Practices Program, FY2002, Lorena F. Truett, Michaela A. Martin, and Bruce E. Tonn, ORNL/TM-2003/227, 2003
• Technology Commercialization Impact Study, 2003
• Study of Energy Savings Generated by Clients of the Industrial Assessment Center Program, 2002
• Leveraging Benefits Attributable to Centers within the Industrial Assessment Center Program, Michaela Martin, Bruce Tonn, and Susan Schexnayder, ORNL/TM-2002/32, February 2002
• Technology Commercialization Impact Study, 2002
• Steam System Opportunity Assessment for the Pulp and Paper, Chemical Manufacturing, and Petroleum Refining Industries (main report), October 2002
• Steam System Opportunity Assessment for the Pulp and Paper, Chemical Manufacturing, and Petroleum Refining Industries (appendices), October 2002
• Technology Commercialization Impact Study, 2001
• Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It?, NAS, 2001
• Assessment of the Market for Compressed Air Efficiency Services, XENERGY Inc., June 2001
• Industrial Assessment Center Program Impact Evaluation, M. Martin, ORNL, ORNL/CON-473, January 2000
• Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies, NRC, 1999
• Materials Technologies for the Process Industries of the Future: Management Strategies and Research Opportunities, NRC, 2000
• Technology Commercialization Impact Study, 2000
• Technology Commercialization Impact Study, 1999
• National Motor Systems Opportunities Assessment, Xnergy Inc., December 1998
• National Market Transformation Strategies for Industrial Electric Motor Systems; DOE Report DOE/PO-0044; Volumes 1 and 2; May 1996

Back to Top

Bioenergy Technologies Office

Peer Reviews

• 2017 Bioenergy Technologies Office Project Peer Review, March 6-9, 2017
• 2017 Bioenergy Technologies Office Program Management Review, July 13, 2017
• 2015 BETO Peer Review: Review Panel Summary Report and Project Results, March 2016
• 2015 BETO Project Review, March 23-27, 2015
• BETO's 2015 Program Management Review was held on June 25, 2015
• 2013 Bioenergy Technologies Office Peer Review Report: Review Panel Summary Report and Project Results, February 2014
• 2011 Biomass Program Peer Review, June 27-28, 2011
• 2011 Algae R&D Activities Review, April 7–8, 2011
• 2011 Feedstocks Platform Peer Review, April 6-8, 2011
• 2011 Sustainability Platform Review Report, April 5, 2011
• 2011 Analysis Platform Review Report, April 4, 2011
• 2011 Thermochemical Conversion Platform Review Report, February 16–18, 2011
• 2011 Biochemical Conversion Platform Review Report, February 14–16, 2011
• 2011 Infrastructure Platform Review Report, February 3, 2011
• 2011 Integrated Biorefinery Platform Peer Review, February 1–3, 2011
• 2009 Biomass Program Peer Review, July 14-15, 2009
• 2009 Thermochemical Conversion Platform Peer Review, April 14-17, 2009
• 2009 Biochemical Conversion Platform Peer Review, April 14-16, 2009
• 2009 Feedstocks Platform Peer Review, April 8-10, 2009
• 2009 Infrastructure Platform Peer Review, February 19, 2009
• Integrated Biorefinery Platform Peer Review, February 18–19, 2009
• 2009 Analysis Peer Review, February 18, 2009
• Biomass Program's Peer Review, 2007 (Full Report)
• Biomass Program's Peer Review, 2007 (Summary Report)
• Feedstock Platform Portfolio and Design Report Review, August 21-23, 2007
• Integrated Biorefinery (IBR) Platform Peer Review, August 13-15, 2007
• Biochemical and Products Platform Peer Review, August 7-9, 2007
• Biomass Peer Review Thermochemical Conversion Platform Summary of Results, 2007
• Thermochemical Portfolio Alignment and Peer Review, July 10-11, 2007
• Biodiesel and Other Technologies Portfolio Peer Review, August 15-16, 2007
• Program Review, November 15-16, 2007
• Biomass Program Peer Review Feedstock Platform, June 2006
• Biomass Program Review, November 14-15, 2005

Stage Gate Reviews

• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Southern Research Institute, Q4 FY12
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Emery Energy, Q2 FY12
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Iowa State U, Q1 FY12
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Research Triangle Institute, Q1 FY12
• Stage Gate Review of Pretreatment: AGCO, October 2010
• Stage Gate Review of Ethanologen Development Projects: Mascoma, Dec 3, 2009
• Stage Gate Review of Ethanologen Development Projects: Verenium, Sept 10, 2009
• Stage Gate Review of Ethanologen Development Projects: DuPont, Aug 11, 2009
• Stage Gate Review of Ethanologen Development Projects: Purdue, July 7, 2009
• Stage Gate Review of Ethanologen Development Projects: Cargill, June 3, 2009
• Stage Gate Review of Pretreatment: UC Riverside, Dartmouth, Purdue, Texas A&M, Auburn U, Michigan State U, NREL, and University of British Columbia with Genencor, May 2007
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Biomass Gas Cleanup Using a Therminator, Research Triangle Institute, 3/15/07
• Stage Gate Review of Gasification: Catalytic Hydrothermal Gasification for Eastman Kingsport Chemical Production Plant, Antares Group Inc., 1/30/07
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Trace Metal Scavenging from Biomass Syngas with Novel High Temperature Sorbents, Southern Research Institute, 10/30/06
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Engineering New Catalysts for In-process Elimination of Tars Gas Technology Institute, 7/29/06
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Biomass Gas Cleanup Using a Therminator, Research Triangle Institute, 6/15/06
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Biomass Gas Cleanup Using a Therminator, Research Triangle Institute, 3/15/06
• Stage Gate Review of Gasification: Catalytic Hydrothermal Gasification for Eastman Kingsport Chemical Production Plant, Antares Group Inc., 1/15/06
• Stage Gate Review of Syngas Cleanup: Trace Metal Scavenging from Biomass Syngas with Novel High Temperature Sorbents, Southern Research Institute, 10/30/05
• Stage Gate Reviews in the Biomass Program, March 2005
• Stage Gate Review of Feedstock Infrastructure Activity, March 2005
• Stage Gate reviews including Sugars Platform 2004
• Enzyme Hydrolysis, April 2002
• Enzymatic Cellulose Hydrolysis, April 2002

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• None

Back to Top

Building Technologies Office

Peer Reviews

• 2018 Building Technologies Office (BTO) Peer Review, April 30-May 3, 2018
• 2017 Building Technologies Office Peer Review, March 13-16, 2017
• 2016 BTO Peer Review, April 4-7, 2016
• 2015 BTO Program Peer Review, April 14-16, 2015
• BTO 2014 Program Peer Review, April 22-24, 2014
• 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review
• 2011 Solid State Lighting Peer Review, January 2011
• 2010 Solid State Lighting Peer Review, July 2010
• 2010 Peer Review: the cool roof research and the cool roof roadmap, Envelope and Window Program
• 2009 Solid State Lighting Peer Review, July 2009
• Peer Review Solid-State Lighting, July 2008
• Reflective Hydride EC Peer Review, May/June 2008
• Building Codes Program Review, April 2008
• Peer Review of all first-year Solid-State Lighting research and development projects, June 2007
• Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report, Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review," DOE, February 2007
• Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report – Supporting Documentation, March 2007
• Water Heating Peer Review, February 9, 2006
• Commercial Integration (Controls) Peer Review, March 27-30, 2006
• Commercial Integration (Diagnostics & Commissioning) Peer Review, March 27-30, 2006
• Commercial Integration (High Performance Buildings) Peer Review, March 27-30, 2006
• Analysis Tools Peer Review, April 2006
• Space Conditioning (IAQ) Peer Review, February 15, 2006
• Space Conditioning (Systems) Peer Review, February 6-8, 2006
• Conventional Lighting Peer Review, January 25-27, 2005
• Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Peer Review, February 22-23, 2005
• Building Codes Peer Review, May 4, 2005
• Appliance & Emerging Technologies Peer Review, October 25-27, 2005
• Windows Peer Review, May 17-19, 2005
• Building America Peer Review, June 13-15, 2005
• Solid-State Lighting Peer Review, November 1-4, 2005
• Appliance Standards Peer Review, June 28, 2005
• Appliances, Emerging Technology & Energy Star Peer Review, October 25-27, 2005
• Space Conditioning (Thermotunnelling) Peer Review, September 9, 2005
• Space Conditioning (Components) Peer Review, November 16, 2005
• Space Conditioning (Desiccants & Dehumidification) Peer Review, November 29-30, 2005
• Space Conditioning (Diagnostics & Commissioning) Peer Review, December 6, 2005
• Thermal Distribution Peer Review, September 28-29, 2005
• Oil Heat Peer Review, September 27, 2005
• Building Envelope (Lab) Peer Review, December 16-17, 2003
• An Assessment of Research Projects in the Building Technologies Program: 18 Panels Reviewing 114 R&D Projects; Office of Energy Research, 2000

Stage Gate Reviews

• None

Other Process Evaluations

• Drivers of Success in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program – Statistical Process Evaluation (Final Evaluation Volume 3), Research Into Action Inc., June 2015
• Process Evaluation of the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (Final Evaluation Volume 4), Research Into Action Inc., June 2015
• Spotlight on Key Program Strategies from the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (Final Evaluation Volume 6), Research Into Action Inc., June 2015
• Preliminary Process and Market Evaluation: Better Buildings Neighborhood Program, prepared by Research Into Action and NMR Group Inc., December 2012
• Preliminary Process and Market Evaluation: Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Report Appendices, prepared by Research Into Action and NMR Group Inc., December 2012
• Building America Program Evaluation, Harvard University, Volume 1, 2004
• Building America Program Evaluation, Harvard University, Volume 2, 2004
• Compact Fluorescent Lighting in America: Lessons Learned on the Way to Market, PNNL, Report No. PNNL-15730, May 2006

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Evaluation of Home Energy Score Deployment: New Jersey Natural Gas & Wisconsin Focus on Energy Final Report, prepared by The E2e Project, September 2018
• Evaluation of Building America and Selected Building Energy Codes Program Activities, prepared by prepared by Industrial Economics, Incorporated, February 2018
• Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. Department of Energy Investment in HVAC, Water Heating, and Appliance Technologies, prepared by Gallaher, Michael, T. Scott, Z. Oliver, K. Clark-Sutton, B. Anderson of RTI International, with contribution from R. Ruegg (TIA Consultants), September 2017
• Evaluation of the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (Final Synthesis Report, Volume 1), Research Into Action, Inc. Evergreen Economics Nexant, Inc. NMR Group, Inc., June 2015
• Savings and Economic Impacts of the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (Final Evaluation Volume 2), Research Into Action Inc. Evergreen Economics Nexant, Inc. NMR Group, Inc., June 2015
• Market Effects of the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (Final Evaluation Volume 5), Research Into Action Inc. and NMR Group, Inc., June 2015
• Preliminary Energy Savings Impact Evaluation: Better Buildings Neighborhood Program, Final report. Research Into Action Inc., November 2013
• Solid State Light Market Effects Evaluation, CADMUS, September 2013
• National Awareness of ENERGY STAR® for 2010: Analysis of CEE Household Survey. U.S. EPA, 2011 (EPA sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• National Awareness of ENERGY STAR for 2009: Analysis of CEE Household Survey. U.S. EPA, 2010 (EPA sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• Realized and Projected Impacts of U.S. Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Commercial Appliances; Meyers, Steve, McMahon, James, Atkinson, Barbara; LBNL-63017, 2008
• National Awareness of ENERGY STAR for 2008: Analysis of 2008 CEE Household Survey. U.S. EPA, 2009 (EPA sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• National Awareness of ENERGY STAR for 2007: Analysis of 2007 CEE Household Survey. U.S. EPA, 2008 (EPA sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• National Awareness of ENERGY STAR for 2006: Analysis of Household Survey, Goldberg, Miriam, Valy Goepfrich, Jocelyn Spielman, and Kendra Johnson, 2006 (EPA sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways, April 2005, Report No. PNNL-15149
• Realized and Prospective Impacts of U.S. Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential Appliances: 2004 Update, Meyers, Stephen, James McMahon, and Michael McNeil, LBNL-56417, 2005
• Assessing Consumer Values & Supply Chain Relationships for Solid-State Lighting Technologies, ORNL, 2004
• 2005 ENERGY STAR Household Survey, Goldberg, Miriam, Valy Goepfrich, and Jocelyn Spielman, 2004 (EPA sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• Efficiency of Appliance Models on the Market Before and After DOE Standards, Stephen Meyers, LBNL, 2004
• The Structure and Operation of the Commercial Building Market, Innovologie LLC, March 2004
• 2004 ENERGY STAR Household Survey, Goldberg, Miriam, Valy Goepfrich, and Jocelyn Spielman, 2003 (EPA-sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• An Examination of Rebuild America Partnership Accomplishments and the Factors Influencing Them, ORNL, 2003
• 2003 ENERGY STAR Household Survey, Goldberg, Miriam, Valy Goepfrich, and Jocelyn Spielman, 2002 (EPA-sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• U.S. Lighting Market Characterization, Volume 1: National Lighting Inventory and Energy Consumption Estimate, Navigant Consulting Inc., September 2002
• 2002 ENERGY STAR Household Survey, Goldberg, Miriam, Valy Goepfrich, and Jocelyn Spielman, 2001 (EPA-sponsored survey analysis of CEE Household Survey)
• 2001 ENERGY STAR Household Survey, Goldberg, Miriam, Valy Goepfrich, and Jocelyn Spielman, 2000 (EPA-sponsored survey analysis)
• Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It?, NAS, 2001
• 2000 ENERGY STAR Household Survey, Goldberg, Miriam, Valy Goepfrich, and Jocelyn Spielman, 1999 (EPA-sponsored survey analysis)

Back to Top

Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)

Peer Reviews

• Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio. Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012
• FEMP Peer Review, September 20-21, 2005

Other Process Evaluations

• 2001 FEMP Customer Survey Report (Summary Report)
• 2001 FEMP Customer Survey Report (Main Report)
• 2001 FEMP Customer Survey Report (Appendices)

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Utilities Energy Service Contract (UESC) Program Activity Analysis - Phase 2 - Impact Assessment, Report Number ORNL/CON-494, ORNL, 2006
• Performance Contracts Offer Benefits, but Vigilance Is Needed to Protect Government Interests, GAO-05-340, July 2005
• Public and Institutional Markets for ESCO Services: Comparing Programs, Practices and Performance, Report No. LBNL-55002, May 2005
• Review of U.S. ESCO Industry Market Trends: An Empirical Analysis of Project Data, Charles Goldman, Nicole Hopper, Julie Osborn, LBNL, Report no. LBNL-52320, January 2005
• Capital Financing: Partnerships and Energy Savings Performance Contracts Raise Budgeting and Monitoring Concerns, Report No. GAO-05-55, December 2004
• The Federal Market for ESCO Services: How Does it Measure Up?, Report No. LBNL-54952, August 2004
• Assessing U.S. ESCO Industry: Results from the NAESCO Database Project, Julie Osborn, Chuck Goldman and Nicole Hopper – LBNL, Terry Singer – NAESCO, LBNL Report No. LBNL-50304, August 2002
• Market Trends in the U.S. ESCO Industry: Results from the NAESCO Database Project, Charles A. Goldman, Julie G. Osborn, and Nicole C. Hopper, LBNL Terry E. Singer, NAESCO, LBNL Report No. LBNL-49601, May 2002
• Department of Energy's Super Energy Savings Performance Contracts, Audit Report, DOE IG Audit Report No. 0499, April 2001
• Historical Performance of the U.S. ESCO Industry: Results from the NAESCO Project Database, C.A. Goldman, P. Juergens, M. Fowlie, J. Osborn & K. Kawamoto, LBNL, Terry Singer, NAESCO, LBNL Report No. LBNL-46070, August 2000
• An Evaluation of the Federal Energy Management Program Technical Assistance Workshops: Results of a 1998 Customer Survey, G. B. Gordon; N. Hall, April 1999
• The Energy Services Company (ESCO) Industry: Industry and Market Trends, David S. Dayton, HEC Inc., Natick, MA, Charles Goldman and Steven Pickle, LNBL, LBNL Report No. LBNL-41925, August 1998

Back to Top

Fuel Cell Technologies Office

Peer Reviews

• 2018 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, June 13–15, 2018
• 2017 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, June 5-9, 2017
• 2016 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, June 6-10, 2016, Washington, D.C.
• 2015 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, June 8-12, 2015, Arlington, Virginia
• 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, June 16-20, 2014, Washington, D.C.
• 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, May 13-17, 2013, Arlington, Virginia
• 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, May 14-18, 2012, Arlington, Virginia
• 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, May 2011
• 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, June 7–11, 2010
• 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 18–22, 2009
• 2008 Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, June 9-13, 2008
• NAS Review: Review of the Research Program of the FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership: Second Report, NRC, 2008
• Hydrogen Fuel Initiative: DOE Has Made Important Progress and Involved Stakeholders but Needs to Update What It Expects to Achieve by Its 2015 Target, GAO-08-305, January 11, 2008
• 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, May 15-18, 2007
• 2006 Hydrogen Program Review, May 16-19, 2006
• 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Review, May 23-26, 2005
• NAS Review: Review of the Research Program of the FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership: First Report, NRC, 2005
• NAS Review: The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs, NRC, 2004
• 2004 Annual Program Review, May 24-27, 2004
• 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, May 19-22, 2003
• Renewable Power Pathways: A Review of The U.S. Department of Energy's Renewable Energy Programs, National Academy of Sciences, 2000

Stage Gate Reviews

• On-Board Fuel Processing Go/No-Go Decision, August 2004
• Go/No-Go Recommendation for Sodium Borohydride for On-Board Vehicular Hydrogen Storage, November 2007
• Materials Down Select Decisions Made Within the Department of Energy Chemical Hydrogen Storage Center of Excellence, May 2008
• Materials Down-Selection Decisions Made Within the Department of Energy Metal Hydride Center of Excellence, September/October 2007
• Go/No-Go Decision on Pure, Undoped, Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Vehicular Hydrogen Storage, October 2006

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• 2015 Update to “Early Stage Market Change and Effects of the Recovery Act Fuel Cell Program," April 2015
• Early-Stage Market Change and Effects of the Recovery Act Fuel Cell Program, EnerSys Innovation, LLC, January 2014
• 2011 Pathways to Commercial Success: Technologies and Products Supported by the Hydrogen, Fuel Cell and Infrastructure Technologies Program, PNNL, September 2011
• Results of the 2008/2009 Knowledge and Opinions Surveys Conducted for the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program, ORNL, Report No. ORNL/TM2009/242, April 2010
• Pathways to Commercial Success: Technologies and Products Supported by the Hydrogen, Fuel Cell and Infrastructure Technologies Program, PNNL, August 2010
• Identification and Characterization of Near-Term Direct Hydrogen Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Markets, Battelle Memorial Institute, April 2007
• Results of the 2004 Knowledge and Opinions Surveys for the Baseline Knowledge Assessment of the Hydrogen, Fuel Cell, and Infrastructure Technologies Program, R. L. Schmoyer and Tykey Truett (ORNL), Christy Cooper (DOE), ORNL/TM-2006/417, April 2006
• Economic Analysis of Stationary PEM Fuel Cells, Battelle, 2005
• The Fuel Cell Vehicle Survey 2003, Breakthrough Technologies Institute, February 2004
• Renewable Power Pathways: A Review of The U.S. Department of Energy's Renewable Energy Programs, National Academy of Sciences, 2000

Back to Top

Geothermal Technologies Office

Peer Reviews

• 2017 Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) Peer Review, November 13-15, 2017
• 2015 GTO Peer Review Report
• 2015 GTO Peer Review Report Appendices
• 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review, April 22-25, 2013
• 2013 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review Report
• 2012 Geothermal Technologies Office Peer Review, May 7-10, 2012
• 2011 Geothermal Technologies Program Peer Review Program, June 6-10, 2011
• 2010 Geothermal Technologies Program Peer Review, May 2010
• Enhanced Geothermal Systems Peer Review, July 18 and 19, 2006
• Enhanced Geothermal Systems Peer Review, April 7-8, 2005
• Drilling and Energy Conversion, June 6-8, 2005
• Exploration and GRED, July 26-28, 2005
• GeoPowering the West Peer Review, August 2004
• Renewable Power Pathways: A Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Renewable Energy Programs(NAS, 2000)

Stage Gate Reviews

• None

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Linkages from DOE's Geothermal R&D to Commercial Power generation, by Rosalie Ruegg and Patrick Thomas, February 2011
• Retrospective Benefit-Cost Analysis of U.S. DOE's Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments, by Gallaher, M., A. Rogozhin and J. Petrusa. August 2010

Back to Top

Solar Energy Technologies Office

Peer Reviews

• 2018 Solar Energy Technologies Office Portfolio Review, February 12-14, 2018 
• 2016 GEARED Program Review, October 2016
• 2014 SunShot Initiative Peer Review, May 2014
• 2011 Solar Program Peer Review
• 2010 Solar Program Peer Review Report: An Independent Evaluation of Program Activities for FY2009 and FY2010, May 2010
• Solar Energy Technologies Program Peer Review, 2009, March 2009
• Solar Energy Technologies Program Review Meeting and Peer Review, April 16-19, 2007
• Solar Program Peer Review, Denver, November 7-10, 2005
• Solar Heating & Hybrid Lighting Peer Review, 2004
• Photovoltaics and Solar Thermal Peer Review, March 17-18, 2004

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Impact Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy's Solar Decathlon Program, prepared by Lockheed Martin, December 2012
• Linkages from DOE's Solar Photovoltaic R&D to Commercial Renewable Power Generation from Solar Energy, by Rosalie Ruegg and Patrick Thomas, April 2011
• Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investments in Photovoltaic Energy Systems, by O'Connor, A., R. Loomis, and F. Braun, 2010
• Renewable Power Pathways: A Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Renewable Energy Programs (NAS, 2000)

Back to Top

Vehicle Technologies Office

Peer Reviews

• 2018 Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, June 18-21, 2018
• 2017 Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, June 5-9, 2017
• 2016 Annual VTO Peer Evaluation
• 2015 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review
• 2014 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review
• 2013 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review
• 2012 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review Report
• 2011 Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, May 2011
• 2010 Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, June 7–11, 2010
• 2009 Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, May 18–22, 2009
• 2008 Vehicle Technologies Program Merit Review, February 25-28, 2008
• Review of the 21st Century Truck Partnership, NRC, 2008
• Review of the Research Program of the FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership: Second Report, NRC, 2008
• Semi-Mega Merit Review (Combustion, Fuels, Emissions Control, Health Impacts, Waste Heat Recovery/Thermoelectrics, and Deployment Activities), June 18-19, 2007
• Advanced Combustion Engine R&D and Fuels Technology Merit Review, 2006
• Power Electronics and Electrical Machines Review, August 2006
• Exploratory Technology Research and the Advanced Technology Development Peer Reviews, June 6-8, 2006
• Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review, April 18-20, 2006
• Heavy Vehicle Materials Program Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, September 13-15, 2005
• Fuels Technology Merit Review & Peer Evaluation Report, March 2005
• Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, April 19-21, 2005
• Power Electronics and Electric Machines Merit Review, May 2005
• Energy Storage – Summary of the FY 2005 Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Research Program Annual Review, May 31–June 2, 2005
• Energy Storage – Advanced Technology Development Merit Review, August 9-10, 2005
• 21st Century Truck Partnership Peer Review, Summer 2005
• Review of the Research Program of the FreedomCAR and Fuel partnership: First Report, NRC, 2005
• High Temperature Materials Lab Merit Review, November 2004
• Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Review, May 18-20, 2004
• Energy Storage – Exploratory Technology Research Merit Review, May 2004
• Power Electronics & Electric Machines Merit Review, June 2004
• Energy Storage – Advanced Technology Development Merit Review, June 2004
• Environmental and Health Impacts Merit Review, August 2004
• FCVT 5 Year R&D Plan Peer Review, December 2003
• Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It?, NAS, 2001
• Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Seventh Report (2001)
• Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Sixth Report (2000)
• Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Fifth Report (1999)
• Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Fourth Report (1998)
• Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Third Report (1997)
• Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Second Report (1996)

Stage Gate Reviews

• None

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Clean Cities 2016 Annual Metrics Report, Caley Johnson and Mark Singer
• Clean Cities 2015 Annual Metrics Report, Caley Johnson and Mark Singer
• Clean Cities 2014 Annual Metrics Report, Caley Johnson and Mark Singer
• Clean Cities 2013 Annual Metrics Report, Caley Johnson and Mark Singer
• Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Investment in Energy Storage Technologies for Hybrid and Electric Cars and Trucks, Albert N. Link, Alan C. O'Connor, Troy J. Scott, Sara E. Casey, Ross J. Loomis, J. Lynn Davis (RTI International), December 2013
• Clean Cities 2012 Annual Metrics Report, Caley Johnson
• Clean Cities 2011 Annual Metrics Report, Caley Johnson
• Linkages from DOE's Vehicle Technologies R&D in Advanced Combustion to More Efficient, Cleaner-Burning Engines, Rosalie Ruegg and Patrick Thomas, June 2011
• Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Vehicle Combustion Engine R&D Program: Impacts of a Cluster of Energy Technologies, by Al Link, May 2010.
• Clean Cities 2010 Annual Metrics Report, Caley Johnson
• Clean Cities Annual Metrics Report 2009 (Revised), Caley Johnson
• Clean Cities Annual Metrics Report 2008, C. Johnson and P. Bergeron
• Linkages of DOE's Energy Storage R&D to Batteries and Ultracapacitors for Hybrid, Plug-In Hybrid, and Electric Vehicles, Rosalie Ruegg, TIA Consulting Inc., and Patrick Thomas, 1790 Analytics, LLC, February 2008
• Clean Cities Annual Metrics Report 2007, C. Johnson and P. Bergeron
• Automotive Lightweighting Materials Benefit Evaluation, November 2006, Sujit Das, Jean H. Peretz, and Bruce E. Tonn, Report Number ORNL/TM-2006/545
• Clean Cities Annual Metrics Report 2006, P. Bergeron and V. Putsche
• Annual estimate of impact of Clean Cities Program, 2005
• Program Evaluation – Automotive Lightweighting Materials Program Research and Development Projects Assessment of Benefits – Case Studies No. 2., 2002, Sujit Das, Jean H. Peretz, and Bruce E. Tonn, Report Number ORNL/TM-2002/181
• Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It?, NAS, 2001
• Evaluation of the Benefits Attributable to the Automotive Lightweighting Materials Program Research and Development Projects, 2001, Sujit Das, Jean H. Peretz, and Bruce E. Tonn, Report Number ORNL/TM-2001-237

Back to Top

Water Power Program

Peer Reviews

• 2017 Water Power Technologies Office Peer Review, February 14-17, 2017
• 2014 Water Power Program Peer Review Report
• 2011 Water Power Technologies Peer Review, November 1-4, 2011
• 2010 Water Power Program Peer Review Report, October 19-21, 2010
• 2009 Water Power Program Peer Review Report, November 17-18, 2009

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• None

Back to Top

Weatherization & Intergovernmental Programs Office

Peer Reviews

• Peer review of WAP ARRA and retrospective evaluations
• Peer review of SEP ARRA and retrospective evaluations
• Peer review of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) ARRA evaluation
• Peer Review of Scope of Work for the State Energy Program's National Level Impact Evaluation, January 12-13, 2009
• Peer Review of WAP Evaluation Plan, September 2006
• Tribal Energy Program Peer Review, March 2006
• Tribal Energy Program Peer Review Report, February 2004

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Weatherization Works II – Summary of Findings From the ARRA Period Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program (ORNL/TM-2015/139), July 2015
• National Evaluation of the Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program, June 2015
• National Evaluation of the State Energy Program: An Evaluation of Select Activities Conducted Under the State Energy Program, April 2015
• Evaluation of the Weatherization Assistance Program During Program Years 2009-2011 (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Period): Energy Impact for Mobile Homes (ORNL/TM-2014/558), March 2015
• Evaluation of the Weatherization Assistance Program During Program Years 2009-2011 (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Period): Energy Impacts for Single Family Homes (ORNL/TM-2014/582), March 2015
• Evaluation of the Weatherization Assistance Program During Program Years 2009-2011 (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Period): Energy Impacts for Multifamily Buildings (ORNL/TM-2014/583), March 2015
• Weatherization Works – Summary of Findings from the Retrospective Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program (ORNL/TM-2014/338), September 2014
• National Weatherization Assistance Program Impact Evaluation – Energy Impacts for Mobile Homes (ORNL/TM-2014/84), September 2014
• Weatherization and Indoor Air Quality: Measured Impacts in Single-Family Homes under the Weatherization Assistance Program (ORNL/TM-2014/170), September 2014  
• National Weatherization Assistance Program Impact Evaluation: A Field Investigation of Apparent Low and High Savers (ORNL/TM-2014/308), September 2014
• National Weatherization Assistance Program Impact Evaluation: Energy Impacts for Single Family Homes (ORNL/TM-2015/13), September 2014
• National Weatherization Assistance Program Impact Evaluation – Baseline Occupant Survey: Assessment of Client Status and Needs (ORNL/TM-2015/22), September 2014  
• Health and Household-Related Benefits Attributable to the Weatherization Assistance Program, (ORNL/TM-2014/345), September 2014
• Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program Evaluation: Recovery Act Evaluation Texas Field Experiment: Performance of the Weatherization Assistance Program in Hot-Climate, Low-Income Homes, McCold, Lance, Richard Goeltz, Mark Ternes, Linda Berry, ORNL, Report No. ORNL/CON-499, April 2008
• A Survey of the U.S. ESCO Industry: Market Growth and Development from 2000 to 2006, Nicole Hopper and Charles Goldman, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Donald Gilligan and Terry E. Singer, NAESC, Dave Birr, Synchronous Energy Solutions, May 2007
• Management Controls over the State Energy Program's Formula Grants, Report OAS-M-06-05, Audit Report, 2006
• Estimating the National Effects of the U.S. DOE Weatherization Assistance Program with State-level Data: A Meta Evaluation Using Studies from 1993-2005, Martin Schweitzer, ORNL/CON-493, September 2005
• An Evaluation of State Energy Program Accomplishments: 2002 Program Year, ORNL, ORNL/CON-492, Martin Schweitzer and Bruce E. Tonn, June 2005
• Capital Financing: Partnerships and Energy Savings Performance Contracts Raise Budgeting and Monitoring Concerns, GAO-05-55, 2004
• Meta Evaluation of the National Weatherization Assistance Program Based on State Studies, 1993-2002, ORNL/CON-488, 2003
• Estimating Energy and Cost Savings and Emissions Reductions for the State Energy Program Based on Enumeration Indicators Data, ORNL, Martin Schweitzer, Donald W. Jones, Linda G. Berry, and Bruce E. Tonn, ORNL/CON-487, January 2003
• Weatherizing the Homes of Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program Clients: A Programmatic Assessment, ORNL, 2002
• Department of Energy's Super Energy Savings Performance Contracts, DOE Inspector General Audit Report 0499, April 2001
• State-Level Evaluation of the Weatherization Program 1990-96: A Meta Evaluation that Estimates National Savings; Berry, Linda, ORNL, ORNL/CON-435, 1997
• Metaevaluation of National Weatherization Assistance program Based on State Studies, 1996-1998 (ORNL/CON-467)
• Five Case Studies of Multifamily Weatherization Programs, ORNL/CON-434, Larry Kinney, Tom Wilson, Glen Lewis, Synertech Systems Corp. and Michael MacDonald (ORNL), April 1997
• Weatherization Works: Final Report of the National Weatherization Evaluation, ORNL/CON-395, September 1994
• Impacts of the Weatherization Program in Fuel-Oil Heated Houses, Levins, William P., Ternes, Mark, ORNL, ORNL/CON-327, October, 1994
• Patterns of Impact in the Weatherization Assistance Program: A Closer Look, ORNL/CON-326, June 1994
• The Scope of the Weatherization Assistance Program: Profile of the Population in Need, Joel F. Eisenberg, Eugene Michels, David Carroll and Nancy Berdux (ORNL), ORNL/SUB/92-SK904/V2, May 1994
• Keys to Success: Ten Case Studies of Effective Weatherization Programs, ORNL/CON-328, November 1993
• National Impacts of the Weatherization Assistance Program in Single-Family and Small Multifamily Dwellings, ORNL/CON-326, May 1993
• Scope of the Weatherization Assistance Program: The Weatherized Population and the Resource Base, ORNL/CON-325, May 1992

Back to Top

Wind Program

Peer Reviews

• Wind Energy Technologies Office 2014-2016 Project Peer Review, February 14-17, 2017
• 2014 Wind Program Peer Review, March 24-28, 2014
• 2012 Wind Program Peer Review Report
• 2010 Wind Program Peer Review, March 9-12, 2010
• Wind Program Peer Review, November 2009
• Wind Program Merit Review, June 17-18, 2008
• Wind and Hydropower Technologies Program Peer Review Report, July 2007
• Wind and Hydropower Technologies Wind Energy Program Peer Review Report, May 9-11, 2006
• Wind Program Peer Review Meeting (Low Wind Speed Technologies and Systems Integration), May 4-6, 2004
• Wind Energy Program FY2002 Peer Review and Stakeholder Report, December 2002
• Wind Energy Program FY 2001 Peer Review

Stage Gate Reviews

• None

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Impact and Process Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Initiative, Navigant Consulting, Inc., 2013
• Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Wind Energy R&D Program: Impact of Selected Energy Technology Investments, Tom Pelsoci, 2010
• Linkages from DOE's Wind Energy Program to Commercial Renewable Power Generation, Rosalie Ruegg, TIA Consulting Inc., and Patrick Thomas, 1790 Analytics, LLC, September 2009
• Evaluating State Markets for Residential Wind Systems: Results from an Economic and Policy Analysis Tool, Edwards, J., R. Wiser and M. Bolinger. LBNL-56344. December 2004
• Utility Green Pricing Programs: A Statistical Analysis of Program Effectiveness, Wiser, R. and S. Olson, LBNL, Bird, L. and B. Swezey, NREL. LBNL-54437. February 2004
• Renewable Power Pathways: A Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Renewable Energy Programs (NAS, 2000)

Back to Top

Business Operations, Communications, and EERE Corporate

Business Operations

Peer Reviews

• PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review, December 11, 2007
• DOE Benefits Forecasts: Report of the External Peer Review Panel, December 20, 2006
• Green Power Program Peer Review, May 26, 2005
• Summary of Findings Peer Review of the FY2003 GPRA Assumptions, Arthur D. Little Inc., 2002
• Summary of Findings—Peer Review of the FY2002 GPRA Assumptions, Arthur D. Little, 2001
• Summary of Findings—Peer Review of the FY2001 GPRA Assumptions, Arthur D. Little, 2000
• Summary of Findings—Peer Review of the FY2000 GPRA Assumptions, Arthur D. Little, March 1999
• Summary of Findings—Peer Review of the FY1999 GPRA Assumptions, Report to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Reference 33550-20, Arthur D. Little, 1998
• The Department of Energy's Peer Review Practices, USDOE Office of I.G., Report Number DOE/IG-0419, April 1998

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Utility Green Pricing Programs: A Statistical Analysis of Program Effectiveness, Ryan Wiser and Scott Olson (LBNL), Lori Bird and Blair Swezey, LBNL-54437, and NREL/TP-620-35609, February 2004

Communications

Peer Reviews

• None

Other Process Evaluations

• None

Outcome and Impact Evaluations

• Evaluation of the Ad Council/DOE "What's Your Excuse" Public Service Advertising Campaign, June 2010

EERE Corporate

Peer Reviews

• Reorganizing for Results (Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Report, September 2004
• Assessment of Acquisition and Financial Assistance Operations, National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Report, November 2003
• The Reorganization Status of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Report, September 2003
• The Reorganization of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Report, June 2003

Outcome, Impact, and Process Evaluations

• Analysis of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy and Fossil Energy SBIR Programs, by Sabrina Howell, February 2019
• Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy Small Business Vouchers Pilot: Early Stage Outcomes and Impacts, Round 1, 2, & 3 Awardees, prepared by Research Into Action, NMR Group Inc., and Gretchen Jordan, East Mountain IP, and Albert Link, November 2018
• Second-Year Impact Evaluation of the U.S. DOE Energy I-Corps Program, Final Report, prepared by Research Into Action Inc., NMR Group Inc., Gretchen Jordan, Al Link, and East Mountain IP, March 2018
• Small Business Vouchers Evaluation Round 2 Awardees Preliminary Results, prepared by Research Into Action Inc., NMR Group Inc., Gretchen Jordan, Al Link, and East Mountain IP, February 28, 2018
• Energy I-Corps Program: 2017 Case Studies, prepared by Research Into Action Inc., NMR Group Inc., and Gretchen Jordan, February 2018
• Baseline and Process Evaluation of Small Business Vouchers Pilot, prepared by Research Into Action Inc. (Principal investigator and author), NMR Group Inc., 360 Innovation LLC, East Mountain IP, and Albert Link, December 2016
• Energy I-Corps: Year 1 Process and Impact Evaluation -- final report (formerly named Evaluation of the Lab-Corps Pilot -- final report), prepared by Research Into Action Inc. (principal investigator and author), NMR Group Inc., 360 Innovation LLC, East Mountain IP, and Albert Link, November 2016
• Aggregate Return on Investment for R&D Investments in the U.S. DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, prepared by Jeff Dowd, U.S. Department of Energy, October 2017
• Assessment of Financial Savings From Peer Reviews of In-Progress Projects: A Case Study from the Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program, prepared by Yaw O. Agyeman, TMS Inc. with Jeff Dowd, DOE EERE, October 2008
• Addendum to Financial Saving From Peer Reviews Analysis: Pairwise Comparison of Ratings for Repeatedly Reviewed Projects, October 2008
• Impact of Extended Daylight Saving Time on National Energy Consumption, Report to Congress, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 110, October 2008
• Impact of Extended Daylight Saving Time on National Energy Consumption, Technical Documentation, David B. Belzer (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Stanton W. Hadley (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), and Shih-Miao Chin (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), October 2008
• EERE Retrospective Study Brief — Demonstrating Results Achieved by EERE Programs
  • "DOE Wind Energy R&D is Linked to Innovations Within and Outside Wind Power Industry, Study Finds," September 2009
  • "Study Finds DOE-Funded Research in Energy Storage Provides a Vital Foundation for Success of Today's Hybrid & Electric Vehicles," May 2009
  • "DOE Hydrogen Program Saved Nearly $30 Million by Investing in Annual In-Progress Peer Reviews," October 2008