You are here

Whistleblower Cases

RSS
March 3, 2011
TBU-0113 - In the Matter of Gennady Ozeryansky

Gennady Ozeryansky (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation and request for investigation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708,
the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the Appeal should be dismissed without prejudice and the matter should be remanded for further processing.

February 14, 2011
TBH-0104 - In the Matter of Hansford F. Johnson

This Initial Agency Decision involves a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Hansford F. Johnson against B&W Pantex LLC (B&W) under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The complainant was an employee of B&W, the firm employed by DOE to manage and operate the Pantex Plant, where he was employed as a Program Manager, working as the plant energy manager until he retired on March 24, 2010. Mr.

January 20, 2011
TBH-0105 - In the Matter of Colleen Monk

This Decision concerns a Complaint filed by Colleen Monk (hereinafter referred to as “Ms. Monk” or “the Complainant”) against Washington TRU Solutions, VJ Technologies, and Mobile Characterization Services (hereinafter referred to individually as “WTS,” “VJT,” and “MCS,” respectively, or collectively as “the Respondents”), under the Department of Energy’s (DOE)
Contractor Employee Protection Program regulations found at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. At all times relevant to this proceeding, the Respondents were DOE contractors operating in Los Alamos, New

January 13, 2011
TBZ-0100 - In the Matter of Vinod C. Chudgar

This Decision will consider a Motion to Dismiss filed by Savannah River Remediation, LLC (“SRR” or “Respondent”), the Management and Operating Contractor for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS), in connection with the pending Complaint of Retaliation filed by Vinod Chudgar (“Complainant” or “the complainant”) against SRR under the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 708.

January 13, 2011
TBH-0100 - In the Matter of Vinod C. Chudgar

This Decision will consider a Motion to Dismiss filed by Savannah River Remediation, LLC (“SRR” or “Respondent”), the Management and Operating Contractor for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS), in connection with the pending Complaint of Retaliation filed by Vinod Chudgar (“Complainant” or “the complainant”) against SRR under the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 708.

January 6, 2011
TBZ-0102 - IN THE MATTER OF MARY RAVAGE

This Decision will consider a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Medcor, Inc. (Medcor), a subcontractor providing medical services at the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Site, in connection with the pending Complaint of Retaliation filed by Mary Ravage against Medcor under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) assigned the hearing component of Ms. Ravage’s Part 708 Complaint proceeding, Case No. TBH-0102, and Medcor’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Case No. TBZ-0102.

January 6, 2011
TBH-0102 - In the Matter of Mary Ravage

This Decision will consider a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Medcor, Inc. (Medcor), a subcontractor providing medical services at the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Site, in connection with the pending Complaint of Retaliation filed by Mary Ravage against Medcor under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) assigned the hearing component of Ms. Ravage’s Part 708 Complaint proceeding, Case No. TBH-0102, and Medcor’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Case No. TBZ-0102.

December 6, 2010
TBU-0110 - In the Matter of Greta Kathy Congable

Greta Kathy Congable (the Appellant) appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation and request for investigation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the Appeal should be granted in part and remanded for further processing.

November 24, 2010
TBZ-0104 In the Matter of Hansford F. Johnson

This Decision will consider a Motion to Dismiss filed by B&W Pantex LLC (B&W), the Management and Operating Contractor for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Pantex Plant (Pantex), in connection with the pending Complaint of Retaliation filed by Hansford F. Johnson against B&W under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) assigned the hearing component of Mr. Johnson’s Part 708 Complaint proceeding, Case No. TBH-0104, and B&W’s Motion to Dismiss, Case No.

November 17, 2010
TBZ-2097 - IN THE MATTER OF DAVID M. WIDGER

This Decision will consider two Motions to Dismiss filed by Safety & Ecology Corp. (SEC), a Department of Energy (DOE) contractor located in upstate New York. SEC seeks dismissal of a Complaint that David M. Widger filed against it on October 19, 2009, under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program, set forth at 10 C.F.R. Part 708. OHA has assigned Mr. Widger’s Complaint Case No. TBH-0097 and the present Motions to Dismiss Case Numbers TBZ-1097 and TBZ-2097.