On July 14, 2016, OHA granted an Appeal involving a Complaint filed by Dr. Shou-Yuan Zhang against Brookhaven Science Associates (BSA) under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 CFR Part 708. In his Complaint, Dr. Zhang alleged that in an email to a BSA official, he reported research misconduct and that, in response, BSA transferred him to a new position. The DOE’s Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) dismissed the Complaint on the grounds that Dr. Zhang had not made a disclosure protected by Part 708 and that BSA had offered Dr.
On July 12, 2016, OHA denied the Appeal of a dismissal of a Complaint filed by Charles K. MacLeod against Fluor-BWXT Portsmouth LLC (FBP) under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 CFR Part 708. In his Complaint, Mr. MacLeod alleged that FBP had terminated him from his position in the Labor Relations Office in retaliation for his opposition to FBP’s use of a particular law firm to investigate allegations of irregularities in that office. Specifically, Mr.
On May 16, 2016, OHA denied an Appeal of a dismissal of a Complaint filed by Richard Lusby against Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) under the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 CFR Part 708. In his Complaint, Mr. Lusby alleged that SRNS had failed to hire him for several positions for which he had applied. He further alleged that the contractor’s actions constituted retaliation for his prior Notice of Employee Concern, filed with SNRS on July 24, 2013. In that prior concern, Mr.
On December 31, 2015, OHA denied an Appeal involving a Complaint filed by Sandra Black against Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC (SRNS) under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 CFR Part 708. In her Complaint, Black alleged SRNS terminated her for engaging in protected activities, specifically citing her participation in a Government Accountability Office review as a protected disclosure. An OHA Attorney-Investigator dismissed Black’s Complaint because she also filed a whistleblower complaint with the U.S.
On December 28, 2015, OHA denied an Appeal involving a Complaint filed by Krishnan Balasubramanian (Balasubramanian) against Lawrence Livermore National Security (LLNS), management and operating contractor for DOE’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 CFR Part 708. Following Balasubramanian’s third request for a health-related postponement of his Part 708 hearing, an OHA Administrative Judge dismissed Balasubramanian’s Complaint without prejudice, subject to Balasubramanian refiling hi
On July 21, 2015, an OHA Administrative Judge granted in part and denied in part a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by UChicago Argonne LLC (Argonne). In its Motion, Argonne sought dismissal of a Part 708 complaint filed by Jonathan McKay against the contractor on several grounds. After considering the parties’ full briefing of this matter, the Administrative Judge determined that: (1) Argonne’s alleged retaliatory acts that occurred more than 90 days before Mr.
On July 7, 2015, the OHA issued a decision granting in part a jurisdictional appeal filed by Ms. Stacey Kittner, a former senior member of the technical staff of Sandia National Laboratory (Sandia). Ms. Kittner appealed the National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) June 4, 2015, dismissal of a whistleblower complaint that she filed under 10 CFR Part 708, the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. OHA denied those portions of the appeal that were based upon Ms.
On May 29, 2015, OHA granted an Appeal involving a complaint filed by Robert J. Schumacher (Schumacher) against Bechtel National, Inc. (Bechtel), a DOE prime contractor that coordinates the construction of DOE’s Hanford Site’s Waste Treatment Plant, under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program and its governing regulations set forth at 10 CFR Part 708. Schumacher’s complaint was dismissed by an OHA investigator because he did not file his complaint within the 90-day regulatory deadline which elapsed on July 13, 2014.
On April 2, 2015, the OHA issued a decision denying, due to lack of jurisdiction, an Appeal filed by Mr. Charles W. Trask III of the dismissal of his whistleblower complaint by the Whistleblower Program Manager for the Employee Concerns Program of the National Nuclear Security Administration. Mr. Trask filed the Complaint against his former employer, Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS), under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program (10 CFR Part 708). In the Complaint, Mr.
On March 9, 2015, OHA denied an Appeal of the dismissal of a complaint filed by Anthony T. Rivera (Rivera) against Lawrence Livermore National Security (LLNS), management and operating contractor for DOE’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, under the DOE’s Contractor Employee Protection Program (10 CFR Part 708). In his complaint, Rivera alleges that he was terminated from his position with LLNS because he had made a series of disclosures concerning alleged fraud, abuse of authority, gross waste of funds, health and safety, and gross mismanagement.